ArticleMedical physics2019
Cross-modality (CT-MRI) prior augmented deep learning for robust lung tumor segmentation from small MR datasets.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic MRI from radiotherapy planning CT images for Head-and-Neck Cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Label-Free Lung MRI Segmentation via Misalignment-Aware Diffusion Translation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- On-board synthetic 4D MRI generation from 4D CBCT for radiotherapy of abdominal tumors: A feasibility study.Medical physics · 2024Article
- CrossMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Shortening image registration time using a deep neural network for patient positional verification in radiotherapy.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Deep Learning Approaches for Data Augmentation in Medical Imaging: A Review.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Image Turing test and its applications on synthetic chest radiographs by using the progressive growing generative adversarial network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Machine learning in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Research on Segmentation Technology in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Based on Deep Learning.Current medical imaging · 2023Review
- Deep learning in structural and functional lung image analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Computational approaches to detect small lesions inJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Random Multi-Channel Image Synthesis for Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Imaging.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2021Article
- Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Review
- Realistic High-Resolution Body Computed Tomography Image Synthesis by Using Progressive Growing Generative Adversarial Network: Visual Turing Test.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- A narrative review on characterization of acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19-infected lungs using artificial intelligence.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Review
- Lung parenchymal characterization via thoracic dynamic MRI in normal children and pediatric patients with TIS.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- A review on medical imaging synthesis using deep learning and its clinical applications.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Review
- A super-resolution framework for the reconstruction of T2-weighted (T2w) time-resolved (TR) 4DMRI using T1w TR-4DMRI as the guidance.Medical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate tumor segmentation is a requirement for magnetic resonance (MR)-based radiotherapy. Lack of large expert annotated MR datasets makes training deep learning models difficult. Therefore, a cross-modality (MR-CT) deep learning segmentation approach that augments training data using pseudo MR images produced by transforming expert-segmented CT images was developed.
methodsEighty-one T2-weighted MRI scans from 28 patients with non-small cell lung cancers (nine with pretreatment and weekly MRI and the remainder with pre-treatment MRI scans) were analyzed. Cross-modality model encoding the transformation of CT to pseudo MR images resembling T2w MRI was learned as a generative adversarial deep learning network. This model was used to translate 377 expert segmented non-small cell lung cancer CT scans from the Cancer Imaging Archive into pseudo MRI that served as additional training set. This method was benchmarked against shallow learning using random forest, standard data augmentation, and three state-of-the art adversarial learning-based cross-modality data (pseudo MR) augmentation methods. Segmentation accuracy was computed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance metrics, and volume ratio.
resultsThe proposed approach produced the lowest statistical variability in the intensity distribution between pseudo and T2w MR images measured as Kullback-Leibler divergence of 0.069. This method produced the highest segmentation accuracy with a DSC of (0.75 ± 0.12) and the lowest Hausdorff distance of (9.36 mm ± 6.00 mm) on the test dataset using a U-Net structure. This approach produced highly similar estimations of tumor growth as an expert (P = 0.37).
conclusionsA novel deep learning MR segmentation was developed that overcomes the limitation of learning robust models from small datasets by leveraging learned cross-modality information using a model that explicitly incorporates knowledge of tumors in modality translation to augment segmentation training. The results show the feasibility of the approach and the corresponding improvement over the state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.