ArticleObesity surgery2019
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for High-Risk Patients in a Monocentric Series: Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors of Success.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery and its predictors: Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Critical Time Points for Assessing Long-Term Clinical Response After Sleeve Gastrectomy-A Retrospective Study of Patients with 13-Year Follow-Up.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- The first survey addressing patients with BMI over 50: a survey of 789 bariatric surgeons.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- A Single-Center Experience: What is the Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients With a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m²?Cureus · 2022Article
- The influence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome on anthropometric parameters at 12 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained popularity as a stand-alone bariatric procedure, but only a few reports provide data of long-term outcomes on high-risk patients.
objectiveTo evaluate long-term efficacy of LSG as a definitive management on high-risk obese patients and to study factors that predict its success.
settingUniversity hospital in Spain.
methodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 134 high-risk patients undergoing LSG from January 2007 through December 2016. Long-term weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.
resultsOne hundred thirty-four high-risk patients underwent LSG. The mean overall follow-up time was 70.9 ± 4.5 months. The mean age was 47 ± 11.0 years. The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 55.9 ± 6.7 kg/m
conclusionThis study supports effectiveness and durability of LSG as a definitive bariatric procedure in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31273648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.