Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273647›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Establishing a donor stool bank for faecal microbiota transplantation: methods and feasibility.

Anne A Rode, Peter Bytzer, Ole Birger Pedersen, Jørgen Engberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Korea.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Faecal microbiota transplantation forUnited European gastroenterology journal · 2020
    Observational
  15. Regulation, risk and safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplant.Infection prevention in practice · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne A RodeDepartment of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark. aala@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-5169
Peter BytzerDepartment of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Ole Birger PedersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørgen EngbergDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Slagelse Hospital, Ingemannsvej 46, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment, but donor selection and implementation in clinical practice are difficult. Here, we describe the establishment of a donor stool bank based on the Tissue Act. Stool donors were recruited among blood donors and asked to donate five times in a month. A screening questionnaire, a medical interview and testing of blood and stool were conducted before and after donations. Donations were made at home and transported to the lab, where 50 g of stool was suspended and filtered in saline and 20-mL glycerol (final concentration of 10%) to a volume of 170 mL. The processed stool was assigned a batch number, frozen within 2 h after defecation and stored at - 80 °C for up to 1 year. All steps were documented and cross-checked before donor stool were released for clinical use. Thirteen donors were eligible at the first interview and started donations. Two donors were excluded due to a positive Helicobacter pylori test, two withdrew consent and one was lost to follow-up. One donor took a single dose of NSAIDs 2 days prior to a donation, which was discarded. There were no other excluding findings at the second interview or testing. Eight of the 13 donors were approved as stool donors. All donated five times with each donation yielding 1-6 portions. Eighty-four portions were released for clinical use. Recruiting stool donors among blood donors is safe and effective. The Tissue Act yields an appropriate regulative framework for FMT.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsAdolescentAdultBiological Specimen BanksFecal Microbiota TransplantationFemaleHelicobacter InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBlood donorsDonor selectionDonor stool bankFaecal microbiota transplantationFMTThe tissue act

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.