Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273608›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2019

When proteins play tag: the dynamic nature of the replisome.

Stefan H Mueller, Lisanne M Spenkelink, Antoine M van Oijen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA replication machinery: Insights fromComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 2019-A year in Biophysical Reviews.Biophysical reviews · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan H MuellerMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
Lisanne M SpenkelinkMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
Antoine M van OijenMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia. vanoijen@uow.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-5161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication, or the copying of DNA, is a fundamental process to all life. The system of proteins that carries out replication, the replisome, encounters many roadblocks on its way. An inability of the replisome to properly overcome these roadblocks will negatively affect genomic integrity which in turn can lead to disease. Over the past decades, efforts by many researchers using a broad array of approaches have revealed roles for many different proteins during the initial response of the replisome upon encountering roadblocks. Here, we revisit what is known about DNA replication and the effect of roadblocks during DNA replication across different organisms. We also address how advances in single-molecule techniques have changed our view of the replisome from a highly stable machine with behavior dictated by deterministic principles to a dynamic system that is controlled by stochastic processes. We propose that these dynamics will play crucial roles in roadblock bypass. Further single-molecule studies of this bypass will, therefore, be essential to facilitate the in-depth investigation of multi-protein complexes that is necessary to understand complicated collisions on the DNA.

Indexed as

Concentration-dependent exchange dynamicsDNA damageDNA replicationMulti-protein complexesSingle-molecule biophysics

Identifiers

PMID31273608
PMCPMC6682189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.