ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Bypassing the volume conduction effect by multilayer neural network for effective connectivity estimation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking heartbeats with the cortical network dynamics involved in self-social touch distinction.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A framework for quantifying the coupling between brain connectivity and heartbeat dynamics: Insights into the disrupted network physiology in Parkinson's disease.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Frequency-specific network effective connectivity: ERP analysis of recognition memory process by directed connectivity estimators.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiation of real interactions between different brain regions from spurious ones has been a challenge in neuroimaging researches. While using electroencephalographic data, those spurious interactions are mostly caused by the volume conduction (VC) effect between the recording sites. In this study, we address the problem by jointly modeling the causal relationships among brain regions and the mixing effects of volume conduction. The VC effect is formulated with a time-invariant linear equation, and the causal relationships between the brain regions are modeled with a nonlinear multivariate autoregressive process. These two models are simultaneously implemented by a multilayer neural network. The internal hidden layers represent the interactions among the regions, while the external layers are devoted for the relationship between the source activities and observed EEG measurements at the scalp. The causal interactions are estimated by the causality coefficient measure, which is based on the information (weights and parameters) embedded in the network. The proposed method is verified using various simulated data. It is then applied to the real EEG signals collected from a memory retrieval test. The results showed that the method is able to eliminate the volume conduction interferences and consequently leads to higher accuracy in identification of true causal interactions. Graphical abstract The proposed network structure used to simultaneously model the volume conduction and source interactions. By this special structure, we first move from the sensor space to the source space at the first layer. Then, within internal hidden layers, the interactions between the sources are represented in the form of a general (nonlinear) multivariate autoregressive (nMVAR) model. Finally, we return from the source space to the sensor space at the last layer of the network. The proposed method bypasses the effect of volume conduction and causes more accurate connectivity estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31273576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.