Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273565›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2019

Cross-Species Investigation on Resting State Electroencephalogram.

Fengrui Zhang, Feixue Wang, Lupeng Yue, Huijuan Zhang, Weiwei Peng, Li Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Facilitates Cortical Arousal and Alertness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Translational In Vivo Assays in Behavioral Biology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fengrui ZhangResearch Center of Brain Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Feixue WangResearch Center of Brain Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Lupeng YueKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huijuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Weiwei PengBrain Function and Psychological Science Research Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Li HuKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. huli@psych.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-2903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting state electroencephalography (EEG) during eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions is widely used to evaluate brain states of healthy populations and brain dysfunctions in clinical conditions. Although several results have been obtained by measuring these brain activities in humans, it remains unclear whether the same results can be replicated in animals, i.e., whether the physiological properties revealed by these findings are phylogenetically conserved across species. In the present study, we describe a paradigm for recording resting state EEG activities during eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions from rats, and investigated the differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions for humans and rats. We found that compared to the eyes-open condition, human EEG spectral amplitude in the eyes-closed condition was significantly higher at 8-12 Hz and 18-22 Hz in the occipital region, but significantly lower at 18-22 Hz and 30-100 Hz in the frontal region. In contrast, rat EEG spectral amplitude was significantly higher in the eyes-closed condition than in the eyes-open condition at 1-4 Hz, 8-12 Hz, and 13-17 Hz in the frontal-central region. In both species, the 1/f-like power spectrum scaling of resting state EEG activities was significantly higher in the eyes-closed condition than in the eyes-open condition at parietal-occipital and frontal regions. These results provided a neurophysiological basis for future translational studies from experimental animal findings to human psychophysiology, since the validity of such translation critically relies on a well-established experimental paradigm and a carefully-examined signal characteristic to bridge the gaps across different species.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultAnimalsBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleOccipital LobeRatsRest1/f characteristicAcross-species comparisonElectroencephalogram (EEG)Power spectraResting state

Identifiers

PMID31273565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.