Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273545›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2019

Identification of bone marrow edema of the ankle: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in comparison with MRI.

Giovanni Foti, Matteo Catania, Simone Caia, Luigi Romano, Alberto Beltramello, Claudio Zorzi, Giovanni Carbognin

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dual-Energy CT in Oncologic Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Virtual non-calcium dual-energy CT: clinical applications.European radiology experimental · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Edema Surrounding Benign Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions.BioMed research international · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni FotiDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 10, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy. gfoti81@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-2402
Matteo CataniaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 10, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy.
Simone CaiaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 10, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy.
Luigi RomanoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 10, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy.
Alberto BeltramelloDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 10, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy.
Claudio ZorziDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Giovanni CarbogninDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 10, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy.
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to identify bone marrow edema (BME) of the ankle.

methodsThis prospective institutional review board approved study included 40 consecutive patients (29 males and 11 females; mean age of 32.3 years) studied with DECT (80 kV and tin filter 150 kV) and MRI within 10 days. DECT data were post-processed for generating non-calcium images of the ankle. Two radiologists evaluated the presence of BME on color-coded maps. Diagnostic accuracy values for diagnosing BME were calculated for DECT maps (qualitative assessment) and for CT numbers (quantitative assessment) by using receiver operator curves and area under the curve (AUC), using MRI as the gold standard. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were calculated with k-statistics. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsDECT depicted BME in 23/25 patients (92.0%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, and accuracy achieved by evaluating the DECT images were 92.0, 86.6, 92.0, 84.6, and 90.0%, for reader 1 and 88.0, 86.6, 91.6, 78.6, and 87.5, for reader 2, respectively. The interobserver and intraobsever agreements were near perfect (k = 0.87 and k = 0.83, respectively). DECT numbers were significantly different between positive (mean - 12.6 ± 29.6 HU) and negative cases (mean - 64.2 ± 34.5 HU) with a p value < 0.001. By using - 20HU cutoff to identify BME (AUC of 0.896.), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, and accuracy of the quantitative analysis were 88.0, 92.6, 95.7, 92.6, and 87.5%, respectively.

conclusionDECT represents an accurate imaging tool for demonstration of BME of the ankle when compared to MRI.

Indexed as

AdultAnkle JointBone Marrow DiseasesEdemaFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnkleBone marrowDual-energy computed tomographyMagnetic resonance imagingSensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31273545
OpenAlexW2955346458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.