Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273527›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2019

Comparison of recovery in pediatric patients: a retrospective study.

Masanori Tsukamoto, Takashi Hitosugi, Takeshi Yokoyama

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04432701 (Which is the Better Choice for Extubation in Pediatric Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04432701 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Which is the Better Choice for Extubation in Pediatric Patients: Proactive or Passive?

TypeinterventionalSponsorEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsCough, Tracheal ExtubationArmsproactive extubation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masanori TsukamotoDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. tsukamoto@dent.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Takashi HitosugiDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Takeshi YokoyamaDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe recovery after general anesthesia is influenced by the choice of inhalational agent. Stimulations might make patient's agitate. However, the recovery using no touch technique might be safer. In this study, we compared the recovery time, awakening end-tidal concentration, and respiratory complications among inhalational anesthetics in pediatric patients using no touch technique, retrospectively. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe subjects were pediatric patients aged 3 months to 11 years under general anesthesia using sevoflurane, isoflurane, or desflurane. Background, awakening end-tidal concentration, respiratory complications, the time of eye open, body movement, and extubation were recorded.

resultsA total of 170 patients were included in the study. There were no respiratory complications during emergence. Awakening end-tidal concentration in desflurane was 0.98%, sevoflurane (0.39%), and isoflurane (0.25%). In patients received desflurane, the time of body movement, eye open, and extubation were significantly shorter than patients who received other anesthetics (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe recovery from desflurane was significantly shorter among three inhalational anesthetics with no touch technique. In addition, no airway-related complication occurred. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The recovery from desflurane might be useful to predict emergence by end-tidal inhalational concentration.

Indexed as

Anesthesia Recovery PeriodAnesthetics, InhalationIsofluraneAnesthesia, DentalChildChild, PreschoolDesfluraneHumansInfantRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, InhalationDesfluraneIsofluraneAnesthesiaNo touch techniquePediatric patientsRecovery

Identifiers

PMID31273527
OpenAlexW2955307448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.