Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273498›Full record

ReviewJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2020

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in small-diameter artificial blood vessel.

Maria Chiara Munisso, Tetsuji Yamaoka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. pH regulates the lumen diameter of tissue-engineered capillaries.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Decellularization of submillimeter-diameter vascular scaffolds using peracetic acid.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria Chiara MunissoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Suita, 565-8565, Osaka, Japan. leeloo791@hotmail.com.
Tetsuji YamaokaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Suita, 565-8565, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) im0502005h0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the tissue engineering research field, the presence of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the peripheral blood of adults represents a promising cell source to grow autologous endothelium on blood-contacting devices. Materials functionalized with EPC-specific molecules are an intriguing strategy to induce the homing and differentiation of the trapped EPCs into endothelial cells to generate a non-thrombogenic surface. Although the EPCs have been identified in adult peripheral blood about 30 years ago, in the subsequent literatures, the term "EPCs" has encompassed different cell populations with a mixed ability to contribute to the formation of blood vessels. This confusion is due to limited functional characterization of "EPCs", an improper nomenclature, and the poorly standardized protocols. This review will screen the literature about "EPCs" to propose a specific nomenclature, phenotypic characterization, and, eventually, a protocol to perform reliable experiments.

Indexed as

Blood VesselsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedEndothelial Progenitor CellsEndothelium, VascularHumansTissue EngineeringArtificial graftsECFCsEndothelial progenitor cellsHUVEC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.