Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273486›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2019

Cesarean delivery to prevent anal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

R L Nelson, C Go, R Darwish, J Gao, R Parikh, C Kang, A Mahajan, L Habeeb, P Zalavadiya, M Patnam

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R L NelsonEpidemiology/Biometry Division, University of Illinois School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA. altohorn@uic.edu.
C GoHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
R DarwishHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J GaoHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
R ParikhHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
C KangHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
A MahajanHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
L HabeebHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
P ZalavadiyaHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
M PatnamHonors College, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCesarean delivery (CD), is increasingly recommended as a mode of delivery that prevents the anal incontinence (AI) that arises in some women after vaginal delivery (VD). The assessment of the efficacy of CD in this regard was the subject of this systematic review.

methodsSearches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Both randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized trials (NRTs) comparing the risk of sustained fecal and/or flatus incontinence after VD or CD were sought from 1966 to 1 January, 2019. Studies were eligible if they assessed AI more than 6 months after birth, and had statistical adjustment for at least one of the three major confounders for AI: age, maternal weight or parity. In addition, each study was required to contain more than 250 participants, more than 50 CDs and more than 25 cases of AI. Data after screening and selection were abstracted and entered into Revman for meta-analysis. Analyses were done for combined fecal and flatus incontinence (comAI), fecal incontinence (FI), gas incontinence (GI), CD before or during labor, time trend of incontinence after delivery, assessment of both statistical and clinical heterogeneity, parity and late incident AI.

resultsOut of the 2526 titles and abstracts found, 24 eligible studies were analyzed, 23 NRTs and one RCT. These included women with 29,597 VDs and women with 6821 CDs. Among the primary outcomes, VD was found not to be a significant predictor of postpartum comAI compared to CD in 6 studies, incorporating 18,951 deliveries (OR = 0.74; 0.54-1.02). VD was also not a significant predictor of FI in 14 studies, incorporating 29,367 deliveries, (OR = 0.89; 0.76-1.05). VD was not a significant predictor of GI in six studies, incorporating 6724 deliveries (OR = 0.96; 0.79-1.18). The strength of the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) evidence for each of these was low for comAI and moderate for FI and GI (upgrade for lack of expected effect). Time trend FI showed incontinence at 3 months often resolved at 1 year. Other secondary analyses assessing parity, delayed incidence of FI, clinical and statistical heterogeneity, spontaneous VD only, late risk of incidence of AI, and CD in or prior to labor all had similar results as in the primary outcomes.

conclusionsThere are three components of pelvic floor dysfunction that are thought to be caused by VD and hopefully prevented by CD: AI, urinary incontinence and pelvic floor prolapse. Of these, AI was not found to be reliably prevented by CD in this review.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansPelvic Floor DisordersPregnancyTreatment OutcomeUrinary IncontinenceCesarean sectionDeliveryFecal incontinenceFecal incontinence/prevention and controlFemaleFlatulenceFlatulence/prevention and controlHumansObstetricObstetric/adverse effectsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31273486
OpenAlexW2953803413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.