ArticlePsychopharmacology2019
Role of dopamine D
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A microstructural analysis of sodium and water intake in male and female rats.Physiology & behavior · 2026Article
- Dopamine, activation of ingestion and evaluation of response efficacy: a focus on the within-session time-course of licking burst number.Psychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Identification of stress-induced epigenetic methylation onto dopamine D2 gene and neurological and behavioral consequences.Gene & protein in disease · 2024Article
- Effects of nucleus accumbens insulin inactivation on microstructure of licking for glucose and saccharin in male and female rats.Physiology & behavior · 2022Article
- Dopaminylation in Psychostimulant Use Disorder Protects Against Psychostimulant Seeking Behavior by Normalizing Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) Dopamine Expression.Current psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex activation disrupts Pavlovian incentive motivation.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Predictive and motivational factors influencing anticipatory contrast: A comparison of contextual and gustatory predictors in food restricted and free-fed rats.Physiology & behavior · 2021Article
- Further characterization of the effect of the prototypical antidepressant imipramine on the microstructure of licking for sucrose.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleAnalysis of lick pattern for sucrose and NaCl and of the forced swimming response after dopamine antagonist administration led us to suggest that dopamine on D
objectivesThe aims of this study were to further investigate the role of dopamine receptors in the mechanisms governing water ingestion, focussing on the within-session time course of the microstructure parameters, and to test the proposed hypothesis. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe effects of the dopamine D
resultsAs previously observed with sucrose and NaCl, SCH 23390 reduced licking by reducing burst number, suggesting reduced behavioural activation. Moreover, it resulted in an increased burst size. Raclopride reduced the size of licking bursts, while their number was either increased or decreased depending on the dose.
conclusionThe results support the suggestion that D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.