ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2019
Network analysis of dynamically important residues in protein structures mediating ligand-binding conformational changes.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring proteins and protein-ligand complexes through residue interaction networks.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Evolutionary progression of collective mutations in Omicron sub-lineages towards efficient RBD-hACE2: Allosteric communications between and within viral and human proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- New Insight Into the Structure-Activity Relationship of Sweet-Tasting Proteins: Protein Sector and Its Role for Sweet Properties.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Allosteric pockets and dynamic residue network hubs of falcipain 2 in mutations including those linked to artemisinin resistance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Structural and conformational changes induced by missense variants in the zinc finger domains of GATA3 involved in breast cancer.RSC advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the generalized conformational selection model, ligand binding involves the co-existence of at least two conformers with different ligand-affinities in a dynamical equilibrium. Conformational transitions between them should be guaranteed by intramolecular vibrational dynamics associated to each conformation. These motions are, therefore, related to the biological function of a protein. Positions whose mutations are found to alter these vibrations the most can be defined as key positions, that is, dynamically important residues that mediate the ligand-binding conformational change. In a previous study, we have shown that these positions are evolutionarily conserved. They correspond to buried aliphatic residues mostly localized in regular structured regions of the protein like β-sheets and α-helices. In the present paper, we perform a network analysis of these key positions for a large dataset of paired protein structures in the ligand-free and ligand-bound form. We observe that networks of interactions between these key positions present larger and more integrated networks with faster transmission of the information. Besides, networks of residues result that are robust to conformational changes. Our results reveal that the conformational diversity of proteins seems to be guaranteed by a network of strongly interconnected key positions rather than individual residues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.