Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273294›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Detectability of biosignatures in a low-biomass simulation of martian sediments.

Adam H Stevens, Alison McDonald, Coen de Koning, Andreas Riedo, Louisa J Preston, Pascale Ehrenfreund, Peter Wurz, Charles S Cockell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adam H StevensUK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. adam.stevens@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8335-4143
Alison McDonaldSchool of Engineering, Bioimaging Facility, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Coen de KoningSackler Laboratory for Astrophysics, Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andreas RiedoSackler Laboratory for Astrophysics, Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-5791
Louisa J PrestonDept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Pascale EhrenfreundSackler Laboratory for Astrophysics, Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter WurzSpace Research and Planetary Sciences, Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-1169
Charles S CockellUK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-0503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of a remnant habitable environment by the Mars Science Laboratory in the sedimentary record of Gale Crater has reinvigorated the search for evidence of martian life. In this study, we used a simulated martian mudstone material, based on data from Gale Crater, that was inoculated and cultured over several months and then dried and pressed. The simulated mudstone was analysed with a range of techniques to investigate the detectability of biosignatures. Cell counting and DNA extraction showed a diverse but low biomass microbial community that was highly dispersed. Pellets were analysed with bulk Elemental Analysis - Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (EA-IRMS), high-resolution Laser-ablation Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (LIMS), Raman spectroscopy and Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopy, which are all techniques of relevance to current and future space missions. Bulk analytical techniques were unable to differentiate between inoculated samples and abiotic controls, despite total levels of organic carbon comparable with that of the martian surface. Raman spectroscopy, FTIR spectroscopy and LIMS, which are high sensitivity techniques that provide chemical information at high spatial resolution, retrieved presumptive biosignatures but these remained ambiguous and the sedimentary matrix presented challenges for all techniques. This suggests challenges for detecting definitive evidence for life, both in the simulated lacustrine environment via standard microbiological techniques and in the simulated mudstone via analytical techniques with relevance to robotic missions. Our study suggests that multiple co-incident high-sensitivity techniques that can scan the same micrometre-scale spots are required to unambiguously detect biosignatures, but the spatial coverage of these techniques needs to be high enough not to miss individual cellular-scale structures in the matrix.

Indexed as

ExobiologyMarsMicrobiotaBacteriaBiomassComputer SimulationDNA, BacterialExtraterrestrial EnvironmentGeologic SedimentsSpectrum Analysis, RamanDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID31273294
PMCPMC6609699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.