ArticleScientific reports2019
Assessing radiomic feature robustness to interpolation in
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assessing AI-augmented training for multiple sclerosis classification in a basal ganglia radiomics model.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- A lightweight multiscale attention network for 3D tumor segmentation in PET images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In vivo variability of MRI radiomics features in prostate lesions assessed by a test-retest study with repositioning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- On the robustness of [18F]-FDG-PET radiomic features to variations in image acquisition and reconstruction settings: A phantom study.PloS one · 2025Article
- PET radiomics in lung cancer: advances and translational challenges.EJNMMI physics · 2024Review
- Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Radiomics and Machine Learning in Prostate Carcinoma.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Mitigating the impact of image processing variations on tumour [Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multi-omics and Multi-VOIs to predict esophageal fistula in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Nuclear medicine radiomics in digestive system tumors: Concept, applications, challenges, and future perspectives.View (Beijing, China) · 2023Article
- Enhancing Interoperability and Harmonisation of Nuclear Medicine Image Data and Associated Clinical Data.Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation in breast and nodal radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Limited impact of discretization/interpolation parameters on the predictive power of CT radiomic features in a surgical cohort of pancreatic cancer patients.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Predictive value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- CT radiomic predictors of local relapse after SBRT for lung oligometastases from colorectal cancer: a single institute pilot study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023Article
- External validation of anEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Feasibility of radiomic feature harmonization for pooling of [Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Article
- uRP: An integrated research platform for one-stop analysis of medical images.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiomic studies link quantitative imaging features to patient outcomes in an effort to personalise treatment in oncology. To be clinically useful, a radiomic feature must be robust to image processing steps, which has made robustness testing a necessity for many technical aspects of feature extraction. We assessed the stability of radiomic features to interpolation processing and categorised features based on stable, systematic, or unstable responses. Here,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.