Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273025›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Food choices: concordance in Australian children aged 11-12 years and their parents.

Prudence Vivarini, Jessica A Kerr, Susan A Clifford, Anneke C Grobler, Pauline W Jansen, Fiona K Mensah, Louise A Baur, Kay Gibbons, Melissa Wake

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Prudence VivariniMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica A KerrMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3150-4047
Susan A CliffordMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-9439
Anneke C GroblerMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7809-7688
Pauline W JansenMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7747-5803
Fiona K MensahMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6951-9949
Louise A BaurDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-9482
Kay GibbonsMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1428-3166
Melissa WakeMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7501-9257
The University of Melbourne · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSnack foods-typically high in salt, sugar, fat and/or energy-are likely important to the obesity epidemic. In the context of a population-based health assessment involving parent-child dyads at child age 11-12 years, we report cross-generational concordance in intake at a controlled snack food observation.

designCross-sectional study (Child Health CheckPoint), nested within the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children.

settingAssessment centres in seven Australian cities, February 2015-March 2016.

participantsOf all participating CheckPoint families (n=1874), 1299 children (50.3% girls) and 1274 parents (85.9% mothers) with snack data were included. Survey weights and methods were applied to account for the clustered multistage sample design. OUTCOME MEASURES: Partway through the 3.5-hour assessment, parents and children attended

resultsChildren consumed less grams (151 g [SD 80] vs 165 g [SD 79]) but more energy (1393 kJ [SD 537] vs 1290 kJ [SD 658]) than parents. Parent-child concordance coefficients were small, ranging from 0.07 for sodium intake to 0.17 for carbohydrate intake. Compared with children with parents' energy intake on the 10th centile, children whose parents were on the 90th centile ate on average 227 kJ more. If extrapolated to one similar unsupervised snack on a daily basis, this equates to an additional 83 050 kJ per year, which could have a cumulative impact on additional body fat.

conclusionsAlthough modest at an individual level, this measured parent-child concordance in unsupervised daily snack situations could account for substantial annual population differences in energy, fat and sodium intake for children aged 11-12 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12538380.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeSnacksAdultAustraliaChildCross-Sectional StudiesDiet SurveysFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedParentschildrenenergy intakeepidemiologic studiesfood preferencesinheritance patternssnacks

Identifiers

PMID31273025
PMCPMC6624032
OpenAlexW2955458437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.