Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31273019›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Hearing, speech reception, vocabulary and language: population epidemiology and concordance in Australian children aged 11 to 12 years and their parents.

Julia Smith, Jing Wang, Anneke C Grobler, Katherine Lange, Susan A Clifford, Melissa Wake

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polygenic Risk Scores and Hearing Loss Phenotypes in Children.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of Obesity on the Auditory Function of Children and Adolescents.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia SmithMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-9471
Jing WangMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anneke C GroblerMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7809-7688
Katherine LangeMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8175-6285
Susan A CliffordMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-9439
Melissa WakeMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7501-9257
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the epidemiology and parent-child concordance of hearing, speech reception, vocabulary and language in Australian parent-child dyads at child age 11 to 12 years.

designPopulation-based cross-sectional study (Child Health CheckPoint) nested within the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children.

settingAssessment centres in seven Australian cities and eight regional towns or home visits around Australia, February 2015 to March 2016.

participantsOf all participating CheckPoint families (n=1874), 1516 children (50% female) and 1520 parents (87% mothers, mean age 43.8 years) undertook at least one of four measurements of hearing and language. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing threshold (better ear mean of 1, 2 and 4 kHz) from pure-tone audiometry, speech reception threshold, receptive vocabulary, expressive and receptive languages using a sentence repetition task. Parent-child concordance was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients and adjusted linear regression models. Survey weights and methods accounted for Longitudinal Study of Australian Children's complex sampling and stratification.

resultsChildren had a similar speech reception threshold to parents (children mean -14.3, SD 2.4; parents -14.9, SD 3.2 dB) but better hearing acuity (children 8.3, SD 6.3; parents 13.4, SD 7.0 decibels hearing level). Standardised sentence repetition scores were similar (children 9.8, SD 2.9; parents 9.1, SD 3.3) but, as expected, parents had superior receptive vocabularies. Parent-child correlations were higher for the cognitively-based language measures (vocabulary 0.31, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.36; sentence repetition 0.29, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.34) than the auditory measures (hearing 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.23; speech reception threshold 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.22). Mother-child and father-child concordances were similar for all measures.

conclusionsWe provide population reference values for multiple measures spanning auditory and verbal communication systems in children and mid-life adults. Concordance values aligned with previous twin studies and offspring studies in adults, in keeping with polygenic heritability that is modest for audition but around 60% for language by late childhood.

Indexed as

ParentsVocabularyAdultAudiometry, Pure-ToneAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHearingHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleSpeechSpeech Perceptionchildrenepidemiologic studiesinheritance patternspure-tone audiometryreference valuesspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID31273019
PMCPMC6624023
OpenAlexW2953814873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.