Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272982›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Effectiveness of additional X-ray protection devices in reducing Scattered radiation in radial interventions: protocol of the ESPRESSO randomised trial.

Remzi Anadol, Moritz Brandt, Nico Merz, Maike Knorr, Majid Ahoopai, Martin Geyer, Damian Krompiec, Phillip Wenzel, Thomas Münzel, Tommaso Gori

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03634657 (Wirksamkeit Additiver Strahlenschutzvorrichtungen Zwecks Reduzierung Der Ionisierenden Streustrahlung im Herzkatheterlabor), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03634657 nacompletednot on this map

Wirksamkeit Additiver Strahlenschutzvorrichtungen Zwecks Reduzierung Der Ionisierenden Streustrahlung im Herzkatheterlabor

TypeinterventionalSponsorTommaso GoriRan2018 to 2020Enrolled700ConditionsExposure of Member of Staff to Medical Diagnostic X-RayArmsPlain X-ray protection shield, Protection shield & X-ray protective strips, Protection shield & protective strips & patient cut-outs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Remzi AnadolKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Moritz BrandtKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Nico MerzKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Maike KnorrKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Majid AhoopaiKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Martin GeyerKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Damian KrompiecKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Phillip WenzelKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas MünzelKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Tommaso GoriKardiologie I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of devices have been developed to minimise operator radiation exposure in the setting of cardiac catheterisation. The effectiveness of these devices has traditionally been explored in transfemoral coronary procedures; however, less is known for the transradial approach. We set out to examine the impact of three different radiation protection devices in a real-world setting. METHODS AND

designConsecutive coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures are randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to a shield-only protection (shield group), shield and overlapping 0.5 mm Pb panel curtain (curtain group) or shield, curtain and additional 75×40 cm, 0.5 mm Pb drape placed across the waist of the patient (drape group).The primary outcome is the difference in relative exposure of the primary operator among groups. Relative exposure is defined as the ratio between operator's exposure (E in μSv) and patient exposure (dose area product in cGy·cm ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol complies with good clinical practice and the ethical principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by the local ethics committee. The results of the trial will be published as original article(s) in medical journals and/or as presentation at congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03634657.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageCardiac CatheterizationGermanyHumansOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesRadiation ExposureRadiation InjuriesRadiation MonitoringRadiation ProtectionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccoronary heart diseasecoronary interventionradiation biology

Identifiers

PMID31272982
PMCPMC6615829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.