Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272883›Full record

Trial reportClinical genitourinary cancer2019

A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC).

Ruchitbhai Shah, Marc Botteman, Caitlyn T Solem, Linlin Luo, Justin Doan, David Cella, Robert J Motzer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01668784 (A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01668784 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Received Prior Anti-Angiogenic Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2012 to 2021Enrolled821ConditionsAdvanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Everolimus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruchitbhai ShahPharmerit International, Bethesda, MD.
Marc BottemanPharmerit International, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: mbotteman@pharmerit.com.
Caitlyn T SolemPharmerit International, Bethesda, MD.
Linlin LuoPharmerit International, Bethesda, MD.
Justin DoanBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
David CellaNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Robert J MotzerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Pharmerit (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis analysis compared quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST) between nivolumab and everolimus among previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma enrolled in the phase III CheckMate 025 trial (NCT01668784). MATERIALS AND

methodsAt 45-month follow-up, overall survival (OS) was partitioned into 3 health states: TWiST, time with grade ≥ 3 toxicity (TOX), and time after progression (REL). Mean Q-TWiST was determined by multiplying each state's duration with its utility (TWiST, 1.0; TOX, 0.5; REL, 0.5). Relative Q-TWiST gains (calculated as Q-TWiST difference divided by everolimus OS) of ≥ 10% were predefined as clinically important. Immuno-oncology-specific sensitivity analyses considered 4 alternative progression definitions: Tumor size increase ≥ 25% from nadir; treatment discontinuation; ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index Disease-Related Symptoms scores; and a composite definition. A scenario incorporating grade ≥ 2 toxicities was tested.

resultsCompared with everolimus, nivolumab was associated with a significant Q-TWiST improvement of 3.3 months (P < .001). In all sensitivity analyses, nivolumab was associated with Q-TWiST gains (relative gain %) ranging from 3.3 months (14.4%) to 4.8 months (20.9%).

conclusionsNivolumab is associated with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful gain in quality-adjusted OS versus everolimus among previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabPrognosisQuality-Adjusted Life YearsEverolimusNivolumabCheckMate 025ImmunotherapyKidney cancerQuality-adjusted survivalRisk-benefit

Identifiers

PMID31272883
PMCPMC8262523
OpenAlexW2946985965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.