Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272484›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Sitting less at work: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in organisations of different size and sector.

Kelly Mackenzie, Elizabeth Such, Paul Norman, Elizabeth Goyder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of Weight Goals on Sitting and Moving During a Worksite Sedentary Time Reduction Intervention.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Using Co-Production to Develop "Sit Less at Work" Interventions in a Range of Organisations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Temporal dynamics of sitting behavior at work.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly MackenzieSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. kelly.mackenzie@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-0465
Elizabeth SuchSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Paul NormanDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Cathedral Court, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK.
Elizabeth GoyderSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2016-09-023National Institute for Health Research DRF-2016-09-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged sitting is associated with a range of chronic health conditions and working in office-based jobs is an important contributor to total daily sitting time. Consequently, interventions to reduce workplace sitting have been developed and tested; however, no single intervention strategy consistently produces reductions in workplace sitting time. Exploring barriers and enablers to sitting less at work has been shown to support the development of more effective interventions. In order to address these barriers and enablers during the development and implementation of sit less at work interventions, it is important to understand how they may differ in different types of organisation, an area which has not yet been explored. The main aim of this study was to determine whether barriers and enablers to sitting less at work varied between organisations of different size and sector.

methodsA qualitative study design was used. Four organisations of different sizes and sectors participated: a small business, a charity, a local authority and a large corporation. A total of ten focus groups comprising 40 volunteer employees were conducted. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were then thematically analysed using pre-defined themes, but analysis also allowed for emergence of additional themes.

resultsBarriers and enablers which were consistently raised by participants across all four organisations primarily included: individual-level factors such as habits and routines, and personal motivations and preferences; and factors relating to the internal physical environment. Barriers and enablers that differed by organisation mainly related to: organisational-level factors such as organisational culture, organisation size, and ways of working; and factors relating to the broader social, economic and political context such as the idea of presenteeism, and the impact of wider economic and political issues.

conclusionsThis study found that although some themes were consistently raised by participants from organisations of different size and sector, participants from these organisations also experienced some different barriers and enablers to sitting less at work. For future research or practice, the study findings highlight that organisation-specific barriers and enablers need to be identified and addressed during the development and implementation of sit less at work interventions.

Indexed as

Sitting PositionAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleOrganizational CultureQualitative ResearchSedentary BehaviorWorkWorkplaceBarriers and enablersFocus groupsOccupationOrganisational cultureQualitativeSedentary behaviourSittingWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID31272484
PMCPMC6611033
OpenAlexW2953486335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.