Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272445›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Domestic fire emergency escape plans among the aged in NSW, Australia: the impact of a fire safety home visit program.

W Kathy Tannous, Kingsley Agho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Understanding Epidemiological Trends in Geriatric Burn Injuries: A National Multicenter Analysis from NEISS 2004-2022.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W Kathy TannousSchool of Business & Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia. k.tannous@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-5652
Kingsley AghoSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia.
RoZetta Institute · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestic fire-related injuries and deaths among the aged remain a concern of many countries including Australia. This study aimed to assess the impact of a home fire safety visit project on domestic fire emergency escape plans among the 373 aged persons using multivariate analyses.

methodThe study used data from a collaborative intervention program by three emergency agencies in New South Wales. It covered 373 older people at registration and 156 at post home visit follow-up. The five fire emergency escape plan outcome measures (participants having a working smoke alarm, finding out what to do if there was a fire at their home, making a plan to escape their home in the event of a fire, finding out how to escape their home in an emergency and finding out how to maintain their installed smoke alarm) were examined by adjusting for key characteristics of participants, using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model that adjusted for repeated measures in order to examine the association between the home visit program and fire emergency escape plans.

resultsThere were significant improvements in participants' likelihood of finding out what to do if there was a fire in their home [AOR; 95% CI 1.89 (1.59-2.26)], making a plan to escape their home [AOR; 95% CI 1.80 (1.50-2.17)], how to escape their home in an emergency [AOR; 95% CI 1.33 (1.07-1.66)] and how to maintain their smoke alarm [AOR; 95% CI 1.77 (1.48-2.12)]. Female participants were less likely to have a plan to escape their home in the event of a fire [AOR; 95% CI 0.86 (0.75-0.99)] and to find out how to escape their home in an emergency [AOR; 95% CI 0.71 (0.61-0.82)] compared with their male counterparts. Additionally, participants who spoke languages other than English at home were significantly less likely to have a working smoke alarm [AOR; 95% CI 0.88 (0.38-0.69)].

conclusionOur findings suggest that home visit programs are able to increase fire safety of vulnerable and isolated older people.

Indexed as

Accidents, HomeFiresHouse CallsSafetyAgedAged, 80 and overDisaster PlanningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesProgram EvaluationProtective DevicesRisk AssessmentEscape planFire safetyHigh-risk individualHome fireNew South Wales

Identifiers

PMID31272445
PMCPMC6609397
OpenAlexW2954841343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.