Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272430›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2019

Practice patterns of ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy for nephrolithiasis: a survey among endourologists worldwide.

Dorit Esther Zilberman, Alon Lazarovich, Harry Winkler, Nir Kleinmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ureteral access sheath. Does it improve the results of flexible ureteroscopy? A narrative review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dorit Esther ZilbermanDepartment of Urology , Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Tel-Aviv, Israel. dorit1e@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2092-4732
Alon LazarovichDepartment of Urology , Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Harry WinklerDepartment of Urology , Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Nir KleinmannDepartment of Urology , Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of ureteral access sheath (UAS) during ureteroscopy is controversial. We aimed to explore practice patterns of UAS during ureteroscopy for nephrolithiasis among endourologists worldwide.

methodsA 15-question survey was designed using the SurveyMonkey® platform. The questions covered the background and professional experience of the potential respondents, indications for UAS insertion, UAS caliber and possible complications associated with its use. The questions were anonymously tabulated in order to determine practice patterns of UAS during ureteroscopy for nephrolithiasis among endourologists. The survey was then distributed via e-mail to all the Endourological Society members.

results216 members responded. 99.53% of the respondents practice as endourologists, 63.4% are fellowship trained and 74.4% are at least 6 years post-fellow. 73.2% practice in an academic facility. 77.3% perform at least 100 ureteroscopies annually. 46 and 76% routinely use UAS for the treatment of ureteral and kidney stones, respectively. In both cases, the 12/14 access sheath is the most common. 42% use UAS in primary ureteroscopy. 90.3% believe that a double J stent insertion is not mandatory prior to UAS insertion. 79.1% think the use of UAS does not increase postoperative complications rate, and if the latter does encounter, then most likely it is either a ureteral stricture (93.2%) or pain (48%).

conclusionsUAS is commonly used by highly skilled endourologists during ureteroscopy. 12/14 UAS is mostly used. Ureteral stricture and post-operative pain are proposed as possible complications following UAS introduction, however pre-stenting is not mandatory as overall low complication rate is expected.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesUrologistsHumansKidney CalculiNephrolithiasisUreterUreteral CalculiUreteroscopyEndourologyNephrolithiasisPractice patternsUreteral access sheathUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID31272430
PMCPMC6610981
OpenAlexW2954698676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.