Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272425›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

The price of personal mobility: burden of injury and mortality from personal mobility devices in Singapore - a nationwide cohort study.

Aidan Lyanzhiang Tan, Trauma Coordinators and Trauma Service Representatives, Nivedita Nadkarni, Ting Hway Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. E-Scooters and Craniofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Major trauma among E-Scooter and bicycle users: a nationwide cohort study.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2023
    Article
  6. Trauma Characteristics Associated with E-Scooter Accidents in Switzerland-A Case Series Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aidan Lyanzhiang TanPreventive Medicine, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 12, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Trauma Coordinators and Trauma Service Representatives
Nivedita NadkarniCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Ting Hway WongSingapore General Hospital/Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore. wong.ting.hway@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-4529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal mobility devices (PMDs) like skate-scooters, electric bicycles (e-bikes) or motorised scooters (e-scooters) have become widely available globally. There are several studies describing the rising incidence of injury from such devices. The aim of our study was to examine PMD user factors between motorised (MotPMDs) vs non-motorised PMDs (NonPMDs) as risk factors for severe injury and the need for hospital admission.

methodsWe analysed de-identified National Trauma Registry data (2015 to 2017) from all public sector hospitals in Singapore for patients aged 12 and above presenting to emergency departments with PMD-related injuries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the primary outcome of interest (higher injury severity, defined as Injury Severity Score / ISS > =9), and the secondary outcome of interest (need for hospital admission). Additional subgroup analysis was conducted comparing only scooters (manual vs electric), the most common sub-type of PMD in our study.

resultsOf the 614 patients in our study, majority were male (74%), median age 33 years, with 136 (22%) sustaining injuries with ISS > =9; 185 (30%) admitted [median stay length 3 days (IQR: 1-6)] and 93 (15%) required surgery. MotPMDs were more common (480, 78%), with e-scooters being the most common motorised device (393, 64%). There were 6 deaths, all in MotPMD users. On both univariate and multivariable regression, MotPMD users [OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.51-12.9, p = 0.01] and older users (> = 60 years) [OR 9.47, 95% CI 2.45-62.9, p = 0.004] were more likely to sustain injuries with ISS > =9, and more likely to need admission (MotPMD users [OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.04-3.29, p = 0.045], age > =60 years [OR 4.72, 95% CI 1.86-13.0, p = 0.002]).

conclusionMotPMDs tripled the risk of severe injury and doubled the risk of requiring hospitalisation, compared to NonPMDs, likely due to higher travelling speeds. Increased age was also associated with severe injury and requiring hospitalisation.

Indexed as

MotorcyclesAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansIncidenceInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsSingaporeAsiaE-scootersInjury preventionInjury severityPersonal mobility devicesSingaporeTrauma

Identifiers

PMID31272425
PMCPMC6610990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.