Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272420›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Adherence to quality breast cancer survivorship care in four Canadian provinces: a CanIMPACT retrospective cohort study.

Mary L McBride, Patti A Groome, Kathleen Decker, Cynthia Kendell, Li Jiang, Marlo Whitehead, Dongdong Li, Eva Grunfeld, CanIMPACT Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Opportunities to improve quality of care for cancer survivors in primary care: findings from the BETTER WISE study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  4. Evolving strategies for the routine follow-up of patients with early breast cancer and the impact of COVID-19: a survey of healthcare providers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary L McBrideCancer Control Research, BC Cancer, 675 West 10th Avenue, Room 2.107, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. mmcbride@bccrc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1559-7420
Patti A GroomeDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Kathleen DeckerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Cynthia KendellCancer Outcomes Research Program, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
Li JiangInstitute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Marlo WhiteheadInstitute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Dongdong LiCancer Control Research, BC Cancer, 675 West 10th Avenue, Room 2.107, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Eva GrunfeldInstitute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
CanIMPACT Team

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 128272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to maximize later health, there are established components and guidelines for quality follow-up care of breast cancer survivors. However, adherence to quality follow-up in Canada may not be optimal, and may vary by province. We determined and compared the proportion of patients in each province who received adherent and non-adherent surveillance for recurrence, new cancers and late effects, recommended preventive care, and recommended physician visits for comorbidities.

methodsCohorts consisted of all adult women diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer between 2007 and 2010/2012 in four Canadian provinces (British Columbia (BC) N = 9338; Manitoba N = 2688; Ontario N = 23,700; Nova Scotia (NS) N = 2735), identified from provincial cancer registries, alive and cancer-free at 30 months post-diagnosis. Their healthcare utilization was determined from one to 5 years post-treatment, using linked administrative databases. Adherence, underuse, and overuse of recommended services were evaluated yearly and compared using descriptive statistics.

resultsIn all provinces and follow-up years, the majority of survivors had more than the recommended number of visits to either an oncologist or primary care physician (range 53.8% NS Year 3; 85.8% Ontario Year 4). The proportion of patients with the guideline-recommended number of oncologist visits varied by province (range 29.8% BC Year 5; 74.8% Ontario Year 5), and the proportion of patients with less than the recommended number of specified breast cancer-related visits with either an oncologist or primary care physician ranged from 32.6% (Ontario Year 2) to 84.4% (NS Year 3). Underuse of surveillance breast imaging was identified in NS and BC. The proportion of patients receiving imaging for metastatic disease (not recommended in the guidelines) in BC, Manitoba, and Ontario (not reported in NS) ranged from 20.3% (BC Year 5) to 53.3% (Ontario Year 2). Compliance with recommended physician visits for patients with several chronic conditions was high in Ontario and NS. Preventive care was less than optimal in all provinces with available data.

conclusionsQuality of breast cancer survivor follow-up care varies among provinces. Results point to exploration of factors affecting differences, province-specific opportunities for care improvement, and the value of administrative datasets for health system assessment.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceSurvivorshipAftercareAgedBreast NeoplasmsCanadaCancer SurvivorsChronic DiseaseComorbidityDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOncologistsPhysicians, Primary CareAdministrative databasesBreast cancerBreast neoplasmsCancer survivorsFollow-up careGuideline-based carePrimary careQuality of careRecommended careSurvivorship care

Identifiers

PMID31272420
PMCPMC6610964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.