Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272419›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

Subjective experiences of neurocognitive functioning in young people with major depression.

Catherine Morey-Nase, Lisa J Phillips, Shayden Bryce, Sarah Hetrick, Andrea L Wright, Emma Caruana, Kelly Allott

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07196423 (Glutamate Changes as a New Neurocognitive Marker in Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07196423 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Glutamate Changes as a New Neurocognitive Marker in Psychosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2026 to 2027Enrolled106ConditionsFirst Episode Psychosis (FEP), PsychosisArmsTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Evidences about Subjective Well-Being in Adolescence and Its Links with Neurocognitive Performance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine Morey-NaseMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Lisa J PhillipsMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Shayden BryceOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.
Sarah HetrickDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrea L WrightMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Emma CaruanaDepartment of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Kelly AllottMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. kelly.allott@orygen.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0640-4634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests that young people with major depressive disorder (MDD) experience neurocognitive deficits and that these are associated with poorer functional and clinical outcomes. However, we are yet to understand how young people experience such difficulties. The aim of the current study was to explore the subjective experiences of neurocognitive functioning among young people with MDD.

methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 young people (aged 17-24 years) attending a specialist clinic for youth experiencing moderate-severe depression. Interview transcripts were analysed via Thematic Analysis to identify patterns and themes representing how young people with MDD subjectively experience neurocognitive deficits.

resultsFive main themes were identified: (1) experience of neurocognitive complaints; (2) relationship between neurocognitive complaints and depression; (3) impact on functioning; (4) strategies and supports; and (5) neurocognitive complaints and treatment. Overall, young people with MDD commonly experienced a range of subjective neurocognitive complaints. These appeared to have a bidirectional relationship with depressive symptomatology and significantly disrupted vocational, social and independent functioning, and aspects of psychological well-being including self-esteem. Neurocognitive difficulties represented an experiential barrier to psychological therapeutic engagement and were perceived as variably responsive to psychotropic medications, highlighting the need for targeted intervention. DISCUSSION: Neurocognitive difficulties are a common and pervasive experience for young people with MDD, with perceived impacts on depressive symptoms, attitudinal beliefs, everyday functioning and therapeutic engagement. Subjective neurocognitive complaints may therefore contribute to or exacerbate personal challenges faced by young people with MDD and thus, require early identification, consideration in psychological formulation, and treatment. Further research into the mechanisms of neurocognitive impairment in MDD is also needed.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationAdolescentFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleNeurocognitive DisordersYoung AdultDepressionFunctioningNeurocognitionQualitative studySubjective experienceWell-beingYouth

Identifiers

PMID31272419
PMCPMC6609361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.