Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272408›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2019

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3-tDCS): rationale and protocol of a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.

Roderick P P W M Maas, Ivan Toni, Jonne Doorduin, Thomas Klockgether, Dennis J L G Schutter, Bart P C van de Warrenburg

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04054726 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Study on Cerebello-Spinal tPCS in Ataxia

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern University, CanadaRan2019 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsCerebellar AtaxiaArmsActive Transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), Sham Transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS)
NCT06267222 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Trans-spinal Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Spinocerebellar Ataxia: a Pragmatic Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaura Alice Santos de OliveiraRan2024 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsSCA, Postural Balance, Gait AtaxiaArmsTRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION + exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The role of transcranial direct current stimulaton on ataxia: a scoping review.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  4. Treatment of primary adult-onset neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roderick P P W M MaasDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525, GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. roderick.maas@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-1287
Ivan ToniDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jonne DoorduinDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525, GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thomas KlockgetherDepartment of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dennis J L G SchutterDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bart P C van de WarrenburgDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525, GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common subtype among the autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias, a group of neurodegenerative disorders for which currently no disease-specific therapy is available. Evidence-based options for symptomatic treatment of ataxia are also limited. Recent investigations in a heterogeneous group of hereditary and acquired ataxias showed promising, prolonged effects of a two-week course with daily sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on ataxia severity, gait speed, and upper limb dexterity. The aim of the SCA3-tDCS study is to further examine whether tDCS improves ataxia severity and various (cerebellar) non-motor symptoms in a homogeneous cohort of SCA3 patients and to explore the time course of these effects. METHODS/

designAn investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, single-center trial will be conducted. Twenty mildly to moderately affected SCA3 patients (Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia score between 3 and 20) will be included and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either cerebellar anodal tDCS or sham cerebellar tDCS. Patients, investigators, and outcome assessors are unaware of treatment allocation. Cerebellar tDCS (20 min, 2 mA, ramp-up and down periods of 30 s each) will be delivered over ten sessions, distributed in two groups of five consecutive days with a two-day break in between. Outcomes are assessed after a single session of tDCS, after the tenth stimulation (T1), and after three, six, and twelve months. The primary outcome measure is the absolute change of the SARA score between baseline and T1. In addition, effects on a variety of other motor and neuropsychological functions in which the cerebellum is known to be involved will be evaluated using quantitative motor tests, static posturography, neurophysiological measurements, cognitive assessment, and questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will inform us whether repeated sessions of cerebellar anodal tDCS benefit SCA3 patients and whether this form of non-invasive stimulation might be a novel therapeutic approach to consider in a neurorehabilitation setting. Combined with two earlier controlled trials, a positive effect of the SCA3-tDCS study will encourage implementation of this intervention and stimulate further research in other SCAs and heredodegenerative ataxias.

trial registrationNL7321 , registered October 8, 2018.

Indexed as

Machado-Joseph DiseaseTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAtaxiaCerebellar AtaxiaCerebellumDouble-Blind MethodHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurological RehabilitationOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUpper ExtremityRandomized controlled trialSpinocerebellar ataxiaTranscranial direct current stimulationTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31272408
PMCPMC6610834
OpenAlexW2955522655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.