Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272378›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2019

Validity of accuracy and trending ability of non-invasive continuous total hemoglobin measurement in complex spine surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Feng-Cheng Chang, Jr-Rung Lin, Fu-Chao Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng-Cheng ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, No. 5, Fusing St, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
Jr-Rung LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, No. 5, Fusing St, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan.
Fu-Chao LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, No. 5, Fusing St, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 33305, Taiwan. ana5189@adm.cgmh.org.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-1712-4053
Chang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing complex spine surgery present with multilevel spinal involvement, advanced age, and multiple comorbidities. Surgery is associated with significant blood loss and remarkable hemodynamic changes. The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy and trending ability of a non-invasive continuous method to monitor hemoglobin (SpHb) concentrations using a Radical-7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter in complex spine surgery.

methodsForty-nine patients who underwent complex spine surgery were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Multiple time points were established for data collection throughout the operation. Simultaneous SpHb-total hemoglobin (tHb) paired data were recorded for analyses. Linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot, four-quadrant plot, and Critchley polar plot were used to assess the accuracy and trending ability of the monitor.

resultsA total of 272 pairs of SpHb-tHb data were available and were divided into two groups based on the perfusion index (PI): PI values ≥1.0 (n = 200) and PI values < 1.0 (n = 72). The correction coefficients (r) between SpHb and tHb were 0.6946 and 0.6861 in the groups with PI values ≥1.0 and < 1.0, respectively (P < 0000.1). In the ≥1.0 group, the mean bias was - 0.21 g/dL and the percentage error (PE) was 15.85%, whereas in the < 1.0 group, the mean bias was - 0.04 g/dL and the PE was 17.42%. Four-quadrant plot revealed a concordance rate of 85.11%, whereas the Critchley polar plot showed a concordance rate of 67.21%.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrates the acceptable accuracy of the Radical-7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter even with a low PI. However, the trending ability was limited and unsatisfactory.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeMonitoring, PhysiologicNeurosurgical ProceduresOximetryProspective StudiesYoung AdultHemoglobinMonitorNon-invasivePulse CO-oximeterRadical-7SpHbSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID31272378
PMCPMC6611019
OpenAlexW2954544588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.