Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2019
Validity of accuracy and trending ability of non-invasive continuous total hemoglobin measurement in complex spine surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-invasive vs biological blood determination of haemoglobinemia for perioperative management: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of continuous and real-time total hemoglobin during bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Modifications of peripheral perfusion in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock treated with polymyxin B-direct hemoperfusion.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Accuracy of non-invasive haemoglobin measurements in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate surgery.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
- Multicenter comparison of three intraoperative hemoglobin trend monitoring methods.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients undergoing complex spine surgery present with multilevel spinal involvement, advanced age, and multiple comorbidities. Surgery is associated with significant blood loss and remarkable hemodynamic changes. The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy and trending ability of a non-invasive continuous method to monitor hemoglobin (SpHb) concentrations using a Radical-7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter in complex spine surgery.
methodsForty-nine patients who underwent complex spine surgery were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Multiple time points were established for data collection throughout the operation. Simultaneous SpHb-total hemoglobin (tHb) paired data were recorded for analyses. Linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot, four-quadrant plot, and Critchley polar plot were used to assess the accuracy and trending ability of the monitor.
resultsA total of 272 pairs of SpHb-tHb data were available and were divided into two groups based on the perfusion index (PI): PI values ≥1.0 (n = 200) and PI values < 1.0 (n = 72). The correction coefficients (r) between SpHb and tHb were 0.6946 and 0.6861 in the groups with PI values ≥1.0 and < 1.0, respectively (P < 0000.1). In the ≥1.0 group, the mean bias was - 0.21 g/dL and the percentage error (PE) was 15.85%, whereas in the < 1.0 group, the mean bias was - 0.04 g/dL and the PE was 17.42%. Four-quadrant plot revealed a concordance rate of 85.11%, whereas the Critchley polar plot showed a concordance rate of 67.21%.
conclusionsThe present study demonstrates the acceptable accuracy of the Radical-7™ Pulse CO-Oximeter even with a low PI. However, the trending ability was limited and unsatisfactory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.