Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272368›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Exploring the information transmission properties of noise-induced dynamics: application to glioma differentiation.

Aditya Sai, Nan Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aditya SaiWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, 47907, IN, USA. asai@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-479X
Nan KongWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S Martin Jischke Drive, West Lafayette, 47907, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCells operate in an uncertain environment, where critical cell decisions must be enacted in the presence of biochemical noise. Information theory can measure the extent to which such noise perturbs normal cellular function, in which cells must perceive environmental cues and relay signals accurately to make timely and informed decisions. Using multivariate response data can greatly improve estimates of the latent information content underlying important cell fates, like differentiation.

resultsWe undertake an information theoretic analysis of two stochastic models concerning glioma differentiation therapy, an alternative cancer treatment modality whose underlying intracellular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Discernible changes in response dynamics, as captured by summary measures, were observed at low noise levels. Mitigating certain feedback mechanisms present in the signaling network improved information transmission overall, as did targeted subsampling and clustering of response dynamics.

conclusionComputing the channel capacity of noisy signaling pathways present great probative value in uncovering the prevalent trends in noise-induced dynamics. Areas of high dynamical variation can provide concise snapshots of informative system behavior that may otherwise be overlooked. Through this approach, we can examine the delicate interplay between noise and information, from signal to response, through the observed behavior of relevant system components.

Indexed as

Information TheoryCell DifferentiationGliomaHumansModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesChannel capacityChemical langevin equationGlioma differentiationInformation theoryk-means clusteringk-nearest neighborsMutual informationStochastic modeling

Identifiers

PMID31272368
PMCPMC6610902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.