Ultrasonic assessment of carotid intima-media thickness in migraine: a meta-analysis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. From Headache to Heart Health: Investigating the Migraine-Cardiovascular Disease Connection.Neurology and therapy · 2025
   Review
2. Prophylactic treatment can modify vascular risk biomarkers in high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine patients: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2023
   Observational
3. Stroke territory and atherosclerosis in ischemic stroke patients with a history of migraine with aura.Frontiers in neurology · 2023
   Article
4. Diagnostic significance of transcranial doppler combined with carotid ultrasound in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke.American journal of translational research · 2021
   Article
5. Migraine and Medical Ramifications: A Comprehensive Overview Based on Observational Study Meta-Analyses.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as