Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272245›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2019

Deciding whether to consult the GP or an emergency department: A qualitative study of patient reasoning in Switzerland.

Stéphane Henninger, Brenda Spencer, Olivier Pasche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Importance of the GP-patient relationship.The European journal of general practice · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stéphane Henningera ForOm Nord Vaudois , Yverdon , Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5984-2825
Brenda Spencerb Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital , Lausanne , Switzerland.
Olivier Paschea ForOm Nord Vaudois , Yverdon , Switzerland.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSwitzerlandTime FactorsemergenciesFamily practicemobile phone numberphysician–patient relationshipqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31272245
PMCPMC6713128
OpenAlexW2954965067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.