Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31272081›Full record

ArticleEndocrine-related cancer2019

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias: manifestations and comparative outcomes.

S Felder, H Jann, R Arsenic, T Denecke, V Prasad, B Knappe-Drzikova, S Maasberg, B Wiedenmann, M Pavel, A Pascher and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine-related cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

S FelderMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie (einschl. Arbeitsbereich Stoffwechselerkrankungen), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
H JannMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie (einschl. Arbeitsbereich Stoffwechselerkrankungen), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
R ArsenicInstitut für Pathologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
T DeneckeKlinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
V PrasadKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
B Knappe-DrzikovaMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie (einschl. Arbeitsbereich Stoffwechselerkrankungen), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
S MaasbergMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie (einschl. Arbeitsbereich Stoffwechselerkrankungen), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
B WiedenmannMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie (einschl. Arbeitsbereich Stoffwechselerkrankungen), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
M PavelMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie (einschl. Arbeitsbereich Stoffwechselerkrankungen), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
A PascherKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
U F PapeMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie (einschl. Arbeitsbereich Stoffwechselerkrankungen), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias (gNEN) are an orphan disease, their incidence is rising. The heterogeneous clinical course powers the ongoing discussion of the most appropriate classification system and management. Prognostic relevance of proposed classifications was retrospectively analysed in 142 patients from a single tertiary referral centre. Baseline, management and survival data were acquired for statistical analyses. The distribution according to the clinicopathological typification was gNEN-1 (n = 86/60.6%), gNEN-2 (n = 7/4.9%), gNEN-3 (n = 24/16.9%) and gNEN-4 (n = 25/17.6%), while hypergastrinemia-associated gNEN-1 and -2 were all low-grade tumours (NET-G1/2), formerly termed sporadic gNEN-3 could be subdivided into gNEN-3 with grade 1 or 2 and gNEN-4 with grade 3 (NEC-G3). During follow-up 36 patients died (25%). The mean overall survival (OS) of all gNEN was 14.2 years. The OS differed statistically significant across all subgroups with either classification system. According to UICC 2017 TNM classification, OS differed for early and advanced stages, while WHO grading indicated poorer prognosis for NEC-G3. Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent prognostic validity of either classification system for survival. Particularly careful analysis of the clinical course of gNEN-1 (ECLomas, gastric carcinoids) confirmed their mostly benign, but recurrent and extremely slowly progressive behaviour with low risk of metastasis (7%) and an efficient long-term control by repetitive endoscopic procedures. Our study provides evidence for the validity of current classifications focusing on typing, grading and staging. These are crucial tools for risk stratification, especially to differentiate gNEN-1 as well as sporadic gNET and gNEC (gNEN-3 vs -4).

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsKi-67 AntigenMKI67 protein, humanclassificationgastric neuroendocrine neoplasialong-term outcomeoverall survivalTNM

Identifiers

PMID31272081
PMCPMC6686747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.