ReviewNeuropharmacology2019
Interactions between pain states and opioid reward assessed with intracranial self-stimulation in rats.
Review in Neuropharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist efficacy as a determinant of opioid antinociception in a novel assay of pain-depressed behavior in female and male mice.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of the 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Lack of effect of different pain-related manipulations on opioid self-administration, reinstatement of opioid seeking, and opioid choice in rats.Psychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Confronting the opioid crisis with basic research in neuropharmacology.Neuropharmacology · 2020Article
- Nonhuman animal models of substance use disorders: Translational value and utility to basic science.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2020Review
- Medial Orbitofrontal De-Activation During Tonic Cold Pain Stimulation: A fMRI Study Examining the Opponent-Process Theory.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Opioids are an essential component of current clinical treatments for pain, but they also produce side effects that include abuse liability. Recent media attention surrounding the use of opioids in the United States has elevated the discussion of their benefits and drawbacks to one of national concern, leading to increased scrutiny of prescribing practices. Regulatory agencies have responded by recommending stricter limits on the amount and duration of opioid prescriptions for pain treatment; however, the relationship between pain states and the abuse-related effects of opioids is still not completely understood. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is one preclinical procedure that can be used to study the abuse-related effects of opioids in naïve subjects over the course of initial opioid exposure and in the context of inferred pain states. The goal of this review is to provide a summary of evidence from our laboratory using ICSS to study the modulation of opioid reward by pain states and examine these results in the context of related studies from other groups. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'New Vistas in Opioid Pharmacology'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.