Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31271663›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral rehabilitation2019

Speech evaluation during maxillary mini-dental implant overdenture treatment: A prospective study.

Ester Fonteyne, Luc Van Doorne, Laurence Becue, Carine Matthys, Ewald Bronckhorst, Hugo De Bruyn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Frailty and mini dental implants.Clinical case reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ester FonteyneDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Section Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2627-577X
Luc Van DoorneDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Section Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Laurence BecueGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Carine MatthysClinic for Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ewald BronckhorstDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hugo De BruynDepartment of Dentistry, Periodontology Dental School Ghent, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ghent University · BERadboud University Nijmegen · NLGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large proportions of patients are edentulous and wear removable dentures leading to reduced functional comfort and less oral health-related quality of life. Satisfaction with the oral situation after implantation depends on the outcome in eating comfort, speech comfort and aesthetics. Modification in form and location of the teeth may affect speech. The aim of this study is to determine speech, oromyofunctional behaviour, satisfaction with the treatment and the impact on quality of life of the horse-shoe overdenture retained by mini-dental implants (MDIs) in the maxilla. This prospective multicentre cohort study included 32 patients for treatment. 5 to 6 implants were placed, traumatically piercing the mucosa. Patients were evaluated three times during treatment (pre-operatively with conventional prosthesis including full palatal coverage (CD), post-operatively with provisionally relined CD and with horse-shoe overdenture on MDI). The assessment included a phonetic evaluation, examination of oromyofunctional behaviour, evaluation of the impact on quality of life (OHIP-14) and a rating of satisfaction with the treatment and speech on a visual analogue scale. Several speech sounds are found to be disturbed before treatment. In the next two stages of the treatment, the number of speech issues decreases. In the final stage, ten people show minor speech problems, especially with the /s/ sound. In this stage, seven people still present with oromyofunctional problems, especially whistling problems. In this last stage, people are very satisfied with the treatment (83%) and with speech (84%). The impact on quality of life is low (8.23/56).

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsJaw, EdentulousCohort StudiesDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, OverlayEsthetics, DentalHumansMaxillaPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSpeechTreatment OutcomeDental Implantsadultsdental implantsedentulismoromyofunctionprosthodonticsquality of lifespeech

Identifiers

PMID31271663
PMCPMC6899632
OpenAlexW2955985533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.