Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31271656›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019

Inhaled corticosteroids for cystic fibrosis.

Ian M Balfour-Lynn, Karen Welch, Sherie Smith

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Asthma and respiratory comorbidities.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. STOP Using Corticosteroids in Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbations.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current and Future Treatments in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian M Balfour-LynnDept. Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, UK, SW3 6NP.
Karen Welch
Sherie Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reduction of lung inflammation is one of the goals of cystic fibrosis therapy. Inhaled corticosteroids are often used in this respect to treat children and adults with cystic fibrosis. The rationale for this is their potential to reduce lung damage arising from inflammation, as well as their effect on symptomatic wheezing. It is important to establish the current level of evidence for the risks and benefits of inhaled corticosteroids, especially in the light of their known adverse effects on growth. This is an update of a previously published review; however, due to the lack of research in this area, we do not envisage undertaking any further updates.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of taking regular inhaled corticosteroids compared to not taking them in children and adults with cystic fibrosis. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We requested information from pharmaceutical companies manufacturing inhaled corticosteroids and authors of identified trials.Date of most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 19 November 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials, published and unpublished, comparing inhaled corticosteroids to placebo or standard treatment in individuals with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent authors assessed methodological quality and risk of bias in trials using established criteria and extracted data using standard pro formas. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. MAIN

resultsThe searches identified 35 citations, of which 27 (representing 13 trials) were eligible for inclusion. These 13 trials reported the use of inhaled corticosteroids in 525 people with cystic fibrosis aged between 6 and 55 years. One was a withdrawal trial in 171 individuals who were already taking inhaled corticosteroids. Methodological quality and risk of bias were difficult to assess from published information.Objective measures of airway function were reported in most trials but were often incomplete and reported at different time points. We found no difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV AUTHORS'

conclusionsEvidence from these trials is of low to very low quality and insufficient to establish whether inhaled corticosteroids are beneficial in cystic fibrosis, but withdrawal in those already taking them has been shown to be safe. There is some evidence they may cause harm in terms of growth. It has not been established whether long-term use is beneficial in reducing lung inflammation, which should improve survival, but it is unlikely this will be proven conclusively in a randomised controlled trial.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsChildCystic FibrosisForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVital CapacityYoung AdultAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory Agents

Identifiers

PMID31271656
PMCPMC6609325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.