Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31271478›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2020

Feasibility of INTACT (INcisionless TArgeted Core Tissue) biopsy procedure for perinatal autopsy.

S C Shelmerdine, J C Hutchinson, L Ward, T Sekar, M T Ashworth, S Levine, N J Sebire, O J Arthurs

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Triage and care for women with symptoms or diagnosis of pregnancy loss between 14 + 0 and 21 + 6 weeks' gestation.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem ultrasound vs postmortem 1.5-T MRI for non-invasive perinatal autopsy.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2021
    Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S C ShelmerdineDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6642-9967
J C HutchinsonUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
L WardDepartment of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
T SekarDepartment of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
M T AshworthDepartment of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
S LevineDepartment of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
N J SebireUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
O J ArthursDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 14/168/02Department of Health CDF-2017-10-037Department of Health ICA-CDRF-2017-03-053Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-002Great Ormond Street Hospital CharityMedical Research Council MR/R002118/1Medical Research Council MR/R00218/1National Institute for Health Research NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator AwardPathological Society of Great Britain and IrelandRoyal College of Radiologists MR/R00218/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the feasibility and tissue yield of a perinatal incisionless ultrasound-guided biopsy procedure, the INcisionless Targeted Core Tissue (INTACT) technique, in the context of minimally invasive autopsy.

methodsCases of perinatal death in which the parents consented for minimally invasive autopsy underwent postmortem magnetic resonance imaging and an INTACT biopsy procedure, defined as needle biopsy of organs via the umbilical cord, performed under ultrasound guidance. In each case, three cores of tissue were obtained from seven target organs (both lungs, both kidneys, heart, spleen and liver). Biopsy success was predefined as an adequate volume of the intended target organ for pathological analysis, as judged by a pathologist blinded to the case and biopsy procedure.

resultsThirty fetuses underwent organ sampling. Mean gestational age was 30 weeks (range, 18-40 weeks) and mean delivery-to-biopsy interval was 12 days (range, 6-22 days). The overall biopsy success rate was 153/201 (76.1%) samples, with the success rates in individual organs being highest for the heart and lungs (93% and 91%, respectively) and lowest for the spleen (11%). Excluding splenic samples, the biopsy success rate was 150/173 (86.7%). Histological abnormalities were found in 4/201 (2%) samples, all of which occurred in the lungs and kidneys of a fetus with pulmonary hypoplasia and multicystic kidney disease.

conclusionsIncisionless ultrasound-guided organ biopsy using the INTACT procedure is feasible, with an overall biopsy success rate of over 75%. This novel technique offers the ideal combination of an imaging-led autopsy with organ sampling for parents who decline the conventional invasive approach. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

AutopsyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFetusGestational AgeHumansImage-Guided BiopsyInfant, NewbornMalePerinatal DeathPregnancyUltrasonography, Prenatalautopsyminimally invasive autopsypediatricperinatalultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31271478
PMCPMC7317589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.