Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31271412›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2020

Clustering and classification methods for single-cell RNA-sequencing data.

Ren Qi, Anjun Ma, Qin Ma, Quan Zou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ren QiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, College of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Anjun MaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Qin MaInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Quan ZouCenter for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

Construction of cell specific gene co-regulations signatures based on single cell transcriptomics analysisR01GM131399 · NIGMS · SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, QIN · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate ways to measure the similarity between single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data are ubiquitous in bioinformatics, but using single clustering or classification methods to process scRNA-seq data is generally difficult. This has led to the emergence of integrated methods and tools that aim to automatically process specific problems associated with scRNA-seq data. These approaches have attracted a lot of interest in bioinformatics and related fields. In this paper, we systematically review the integrated methods and tools, highlighting the pros and cons of each approach. We not only pay particular attention to clustering and classification methods but also discuss methods that have emerged recently as powerful alternatives, including nonlinear and linear methods and descending dimension methods. Finally, we focus on clustering and classification methods for scRNA-seq data, in particular, integrated methods, and provide a comprehensive description of scRNA-seq data and download URLs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisDatasets as TopicSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeclassificationclusteringmachine learningsequences analysissimilarity metricsingle-cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID31271412
PMCPMC7444317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.