Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31271150›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Attitudes, Beliefs, and Willingness Toward the Use of mHealth Tools for Medication Adherence in the Florida mHealth Adherence Project for People Living With HIV (FL-mAPP): Pilot Questionnaire Study.

Jamie P Morano, Kevin Clauson, Zhi Zhou, César G Escobar-Viera, Spencer Lieb, Irene K Chen, David Kirk, Willie M Carter, Michael Ruppal, Robert L Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Fall Prevention Feasibility Trial for People With HIV and Alcohol Use.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jamie P MoranoDepartment of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4254-5127
Kevin ClausonDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Lipscomb University, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-8169
Zhi ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-5911
César G Escobar-VieraCenter for Research on Media, Technology, and Health - Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1031-499X
Spencer LiebThe AIDS Institute / Florida Consortium for HIV/AIDS Research, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-4384
Irene K ChenDepartment of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3080-0709
David KirkClinical Research Unit, University of South Florida, Florida Department of Health - Hillsborough, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8840-4397
Willie M CarterImmunology Clinical Research Unit, Florida Department of Health - Orange County, Orlando, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-4806
Michael RuppalThe AIDS Institute / Florida Consortium for HIV/AIDS Research, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3802-6412
Robert L CookDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7770-3754

Funding

Southern HIV and Alcohol Research Consortium Administrative and Research Support CoreU24AA022002 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI COOK, ROBERT L · 2012 to 2022
$5.5M
Social Media Use and Depression Outcomes among U.S. Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Young AdultsK99MD012813 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ESCOBAR-VIERA, CÉSAR GABRIEL · 2018 to 2019
$275k
NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA022002NIMHD NIH HHS K99 MD012813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiretroviral (ART) adherence among people living with HIV (PLWH) continues to be a challenge despite advances in HIV prevention and treatment. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are increasingly deployed as tools for ART adherence. However, little is known about the uptake and attitudes toward commercially available, biprogrammatic mobile apps (ie, designed for both smartphone and short message service [SMS] messaging) among demographically diverse PLWH.

objectivesThe Florida mHealth Adherence Project for PLWH (FL-mAPP) is an innovative pilot study that aimed to determine the acceptability of a commercially available, biprogrammatic mHealth intervention platform to ensure medication adherence and gauge the current attitudes of PLWH toward current and future mHealth apps.

methodsA predeveloped, commercially available, biprogrammatic mHealth platform (Care4Today Mobile Health Manager, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) was deployed, with self-reported ART adherence recorded in the app and paper survey at both short term (30-day) or long-term (90-day) follow-ups. Consented participants completed baseline surveys on sociodemographics and attitudes, beliefs, and willingness toward the use of mHealth interventions for HIV care using a 5-point Likert scale. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified correlations with successful uptake of the mHealth platform.

resultsAmong 132 PLWH, 66% (n=87) initially agreed to use the mHealth platform, of which 54% (n=47) successfully connected to the platform. Of the 87 agreeing to use the mHealth platform, we found an approximate 2:1 ratio of persons agreeing to try the smartphone app (n=59) versus the SMS text messages (n=28). Factors correlating with mHealth uptake were above high school level education (adjusted odds ratio 2.65; P=.05), confidence that a clinical staff member would assist with mHealth app use (adjusted odds ratio 2.92, P=.048), belief that PLWH would use such an mHealth app (adjusted odds ratio 2.89; P=.02), and ownership of a smartphone in contrast to a "flip-phone" model (adjusted odds ratio 2.80; P=.05). Of the sample, 70.2% (n=92) reported daily interest in receiving medication adherence reminders via an app (80.4% users versus 64.7% nonusers), although not significantly different among the user groups (P=.06). In addition, 34.8% (n=16) of mHealth users reported a theoretical "daily" interest and 68.2% (n=58) of non-mHealth users reported no interest in using an mHealth app for potentially tracking alcohol or drug intake (P=.002).

conclusionsThis commercially available, biprogrammatic mHealth platform showed feasibility and efficacy for enhanced ART and medication adherence within public health clinics and successfully included older age groups. Successful use of the platform among demographically diverse PLWH is important for HIV implementation science and promising for uptake on a larger scale.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAnti-Retroviral AgentsChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesDrug MonitoringFemaleFloridaHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsPilot ProjectsAnti-Retroviral Agentsantiretroviral therapy adherenceappdigital healthHIVHIV care continuummedication adherencemHealthmobile healthmobile phone apppersons living with HIV

Identifiers

PMID31271150
PMCPMC6636233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.