ArticleKorean journal of radiology2019
Image Quality and Radiation Dose in CT Venography Using Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction at 80 kVp versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V at 70 kVp.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dose-reduction strategies in whole-body CT for injured patients in the emergency department: a scoping review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based reconstruction improves image quality in low-dose head CT angiography.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2025Article
- Continuum topological derivative - a novel application tool for denoising CT and MRI medical images.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of deep learning and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement-boost post-processing on the image quality of indirect computed tomography venography of the lower extremities.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2022Article
- Explore the Value of Dual Source Computer Tomography Automatic Tube Current Regulation in Reducing the Radiation Dose of CTA in Lower Extremity Vessels.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Building a dual-energy CT service line in abdominal radiology.European radiology · 2021Review
- CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness.European radiology · 2021Article
- CT Image Features under Reconstruction Algorithm in Analysis of the Effect of Probiotics Combined with Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Impact of preset and postset adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on image quality in nonenhanced abdominal-pelvic CT on wide-detector revolution CT.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Incremental Image Noise Reduction in Coronary CT Angiography Using a Deep Learning-Based Technique with Iterative Reconstruction.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Clinical value of a new generation adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodule in low-dose chest CT.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the objective and subjective image quality indicators and radiation doses of computed tomography (CT) venography performed using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) at 80 kVp and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)-V at 70 kVp. MATERIALS AND
methodsEighty-three patients who had undergone CT venography of the lower extremities with MBIR at 80 kVp (Group A; 21 men and 20 women; mean age, 55.5 years) or ASIR-V at 70 kVp (Group B; 18 men and 24 women; mean age, 57.3 years) were enrolled. Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated the objective (vascular enhancement, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and subjective (quantum mottle, delineation of contour, venous enhancement) image quality indicators at the inferior vena cava and femoral and popliteal veins. Clinical information, radiation dose, reconstruction time, and objective and subjective image quality indicators were compared between groups A and B.
resultsVascular enhancement, SNR, and CNR were significantly greater in Group B than in Group A (
conclusionCT venography using ASIR-V at 70 kVp was better than MBIR at 80 kVp in terms of image quality and reconstruction time at similar radiation doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.