ArticleUpdates in surgery2019
Short-term outcomes after duodenal surgery for mesenchymal tumors: a retrospective analysis from a single tertiary referral center.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Operative management of primary duodenal masses: is a limited resection actually safer?Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Pancreas-preserving segmental duodenectomy for duodenal malignancy: two case reports.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Pancreas-preserving limited duodenal resection: Minimizing morbidity without compromising oncological adequacy.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2022Article
- Current surgical management of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- Laparoscopic segmental resection for tumours of the Angle of Treitz: a challenging but feasible surgical option. Results from a retrospective case-series analysis.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Side-to-side duodenojejunostomy after resection of third and fourth duodenal portions with pancreatic preservation.Updates in surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duodenal resections are sometimes necessary for radical surgery. We analyzed technical aspects and post-operative outcomes in patients with RPS and GIST involving duodenum. We identified patients who underwent duodenal resection for RPS and GIST at our Institute between 2000 and 2016. Clinical, pathological and treatment variables were analyzed. Thirty patients were treated: 15 for GIST, 15 for RPS. Sixteen duodenal wedge resections (WR) and 14 segmental resections (SR) were performed. Multi-organ resection was frequently performed (63.4%). Median time to flatus was 3 days (range 1-6), to oral refeeding 4.5 (range 2-15). Overall postoperative morbidity rate was 53% (16/30): Clavien Dindo grade ≤ II: 10; duodenum-related complication rate was 33% (10/30), Clavien Dindo grade ≤ II: 9. Morbidity rates were higher in SR than WR. Duodenal resections for RPS and GIST have significant morbidity rate and whenever it is possible, WR is preferable to SR because of the lower morbidity rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.