Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270615›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2019

Identification of barriers and facilitators in nationwide implementation of standardized structured reporting in pathology: a mixed method study.

J E M Swillens, C E Sluijter, L I H Overbeek, I D Nagtegaal, R P M G Hermens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J E M SwillensRadboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, POB 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Julie.Swillens@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9337-1318
C E SluijterPALGA Foundation, Randhoeve 225A, 3995, GA, Houten, The Netherlands.
L I H OverbeekPALGA Foundation, Randhoeve 225A, 3995, GA, Houten, The Netherlands.
I D NagtegaalPALGA Foundation, Randhoeve 225A, 3995, GA, Houten, The Netherlands.
R P M G HermensRadboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 21, POB 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding KUN 2013-6354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardized structured reporting (SSR) enables high-quality pathology reporting, but implementing SSR is slow. The objective of this study is to identify both barriers and facilitators that pathologists encounter in SSR, in order to develop tailored implementation tools to increase SSR usage. We used a mixed method design: a focus group interview helped to identify barriers and facilitators in SSR. The findings were classified into the following domains: innovation, individual professional, social setting, organization, and economic and political context. We used a web-based survey among Dutch pathologists to quantify the findings. Ten pathologists participated in the focus group interview, and 97 pathologists completed the survey. The results of both showed that pathologists perceive barriers related to SSR itself. Particularly its incompatibility caused lack of nuance (73%, n = 97) in the standardized structured pathology report. Regarding the individual professional, knowledge about available SSR-templates was lacking (28%, n = 97), and only 44% (n = 94) of the respondents agreed that using SSR facilitates the most accurate diagnosis. Related to social setting, support from the multidisciplinary team members was lacking (45%, n = 94). At organization level, SSR leads to extra work (52%, n = 94) because of its incompatibility with other information systems (38%, n = 93). Main facilitators of SSR were incorporation of speech recognition (54%, n = 94) and improvement in communication during multidisciplinary team meetings (69%, n = 94). Both barriers and facilitators existed in various domains. These factors can be used to develop implementation tools to encourage SSR usage.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAdultCommunicationFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMalePathologistsPathologyQuality ControlResearchResearch ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesGuideline adherenceImplementationPathologyQualityStandardized structured reporting

Identifiers

PMID31270615
PMCPMC6861434
OpenAlexW2954273333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.