Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270579›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2019

Intensive care unit length of stay is reduced by protocolized family support intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hyun Woo Lee, Yeonkyung Park, Eun Jin Jang, Yeon Joo Lee

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06128655 (Developing and Testing a Nurse-Led Technology-Enhanced Family Engagement Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06128655 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Testing a Nurse-Led Technology-Enhanced Family Engagement Program (NURSE-TECH-Family) Among Critically Ill Patients in ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled29ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsParticipation in PFCC-IR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyun Woo LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-0260
Yeonkyung ParkDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Portland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-394X
Eun Jin JangDepartment of Information Statistics, Andong National University, Andong, South Korea.
Yeon Joo LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, South Korea. yjlee1117@snubh.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-4272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to elucidate the impact of protocolized family support intervention on length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsMedline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other web-based databases were referenced since inception until November 26, 2018. We included randomized-controlled trials wherein protocolized family support interventions were conducted for enhanced communication and shared medical decision-making. LOS (in days) and mortality were evaluated using a random-effects model, and adjusted LOS was estimated using a mixed-effects model.

resultsWe included seven randomized-controlled trials with 3477 patients. Protocolized family support interventions were found to significantly reduce the ICU LOS {mean difference = - 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) = - 1.50 to - 0.27]} and hospital LOS [mean difference = - 3.78 (95% CI = - 5.26 to - 2.29)]; the results of the mixed-effect model showed that they significantly reduced ICU LOS after adjusting for the therapeutic goal [mean difference = - 1.30 (95% CI = - 2.35 to - 0.26)], methods of measurement [mean difference = - 0.89 (95% CI = - 1.55 to - 0.22)], and timing of intervention [mean difference = - 1.05 (95% CI = - 2.05 to - 0.05)]. Similar results were found after adjusting for patients' disease severity [mean difference = - 1.21 (95% CI = - 2.03 to - 0.39)] and the trim-and-fill method [mean difference = - 0.86 (95% CI = - 1.44 to - 0.28)]. There was no difference in mortality rate in ICU and hospital between the protocolized intervention and control groups.

conclusionsProtocolized family support intervention for enhanced communication and shared decision-making with the family reduced ICU LOS in critically ill patients without impacting mortality.

Indexed as

Social SupportClinical ProtocolsFamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCritical careDecision-makingDecision support techniquesIntensive care unitsProfessional-family relations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.