Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270554›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2019

[Principles and pitfalls of arterial blood pressure measurement].

A S Meidert, J Briegel, B Saugel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparison between invasive and non-invasive assessment of blood pressure in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. [Under pressure-Avoid hypotension].Der Anaesthesist · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A S MeidertKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. agnes_meidert@web.de.
J BriegelKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
B SaugelKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of arterial blood pressure is a fundamental part of basic cardiovascular monitoring in perioperative, intensive care and emergency medicine. Blood pressure can be measured directly via an arterial catheter, which is the most accurate method. Blood pressure is most commonly monitored using noninvasive intermittent methods with an occluding upper arm cuff. Noninvasive intermittent blood pressure measurements can also be performed either manually using palpation and auscultation or automatically based on an oscillometric algorithm. Furthermore, methods such as the vascular unloading technique with a finger plethysmographic sensor are available for continuous and noninvasive blood pressure monitoring. This article explains the principles of the individual methods, the sources of errors, advantages and disadvantages and discusses the fields of application in the clinical routine.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCritical CareHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicOscillometryArterial pressureOscillometryPatient monitoringPhotoplethysmography

Identifiers

PMID31270554
OpenAlexW2954910618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.