ReviewDer Nervenarzt2019
[Non-ambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy : Recommendations for monitoring disease progression and course of treatment].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transition to adulthood in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a systematic review with narrative synthesis on health systems, policies, and the role of health care providers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X‑linked recessive neuromuscular disorder. In children without corticosteroid therapy, progressive muscular weakness is associated with loss of ambulation on average by the age of 9.5 years. OBJECTIVE, MATERIAL AND
methodsOn the basis of current guidelines, a group of experts in this field defined a number of clinical parameters and examinations that should be performed on a regular basis to assess changes over time in non-ambulant patients. RESULTS AND
conclusionTo assess function of the upper extremities the Brooke upper extremity functional rating scale or the performance of upper limb test should be used. For assessment of pulmonary function measurement of forced vital capacity (FVC) is recommended. The extent of cardiac involvement can best be evaluated using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), measurement of the ejection fraction (EF) and the left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF) by echocardiography. The pediatric quality of life inventory should be used for assessment of quality of life. In addition, the body mass index (BMI), the number of infections and need for in-hospital treatment as well as early detection of orthopedic problems, most importantly the development of scoliosis should be monitored. After transition from pediatric to adult care DMD patients should be primarily cared for by adult neurologists and specialists in pulmonary and cardiac medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31270551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.