Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270537›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Pancrustacean Evolution Illuminated by Taxon-Rich Genomic-Scale Data Sets with an Expanded Remipede Sampling.

Jesus Lozano-Fernandez, Mattia Giacomelli, James F Fleming, Albert Chen, Jakob Vinther, Philip Francis Thomsen, Henrik Glenner, Ferran Palero, David A Legg, Thomas M Iliffe and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Robust resolved phylogeny of hexapods' four classes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Revisiting the four Hexapoda classes: Protura as the sister group to all other hexapods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The problematic Cambrian arthropodRoyal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Jesus Lozano-FernandezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Mattia GiacomelliSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
James F FlemingSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Albert ChenSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jakob VintherSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Philip Francis ThomsenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik GlennerDepartment of Biology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Ferran PaleroCentro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Blanes, Spain.
David A LeggDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Thomas M IliffeDepartment of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston.
Davide PisaniSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jørgen OlesenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKKeio University · JPTexas A&M University at Galveston · USUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Łódź · PLUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationships of crustaceans and hexapods (Pancrustacea) have been much discussed and partially elucidated following the emergence of phylogenomic data sets. However, major uncertainties still remain regarding the position of iconic taxa such as Branchiopoda, Copepoda, Remipedia, and Cephalocarida, and the sister group relationship of hexapods. We assembled the most taxon-rich phylogenomic pancrustacean data set to date and analyzed it using a variety of methodological approaches. We prioritized low levels of missing data and found that some clades were consistently recovered independently of the analytical approach used. These include, for example, Oligostraca and Altocrustacea. Substantial support was also found for Allotriocarida, with Remipedia as the sister of Hexapoda (i.e., Labiocarida), and Branchiopoda as the sister of Labiocarida, a clade that we name Athalassocarida (="nonmarine shrimps"). Within Allotriocarida, Cephalocarida was found as the sister of Athalassocarida. Finally, moderate support was found for Hexanauplia (Copepoda as sister to Thecostraca) in alliance with Malacostraca. Mapping key crustacean tagmosis patterns and developmental characters across the revised phylogeny suggests that the ancestral pancrustacean was relatively short-bodied, with extreme body elongation and anamorphic development emerging later in pancrustacean evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, InsectAnimalsCrustaceaGene Expression RegulationGenomicsInsect ProteinsPhylogenyTranscriptomeInsect Proteinscrustacean phylogenyDayhoff recodingPancrustacearemipedestranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31270537
PMCPMC6684935
OpenAlexW2955673773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.