ArticleNature2019
New name for breast-cancer syndrome could help to save lives.
Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Trial
- Can Family Motivation Enhance Men's Uptake of Cascade Screening for FamilialAmerican journal of men's healthTrial
- Contemporary risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies for tubo-ovarian cancer in women with BRCA pathogenic variants.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2026Review
- From Diagnosis to Disclosure: Navigating Genetic Counseling Dilemmas inCase reports in genetics · 2026Article
- Gender-Specific Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer:Cancers · 2024Review
- Pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and TP53 increase lung cancer risk in Chinese.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Disparities in germline testing among racial minorities with prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2022Review
- Investigating men's motivations to engage in genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Updates in Prostate Cancer Research and Screening in Men at Genetically Higher Risk.Current genetic medicine reports · 2021Review
- A Case-Based Clinical Approach to the Investigation, Management and Screening of Families with BRCA2 Related Prostate Cancer.The application of clinical genetics · 2021Review
- Practical Considerations and Challenges for Germline Genetic Testing in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Germline Genetics Working Group of the PCCTC.JCO oncology practice · 2020Review
- Germline variants in DNA repair genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome: analysis of a 21 gene panel in the Brazilian population.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- Engaging Men With BRCA-Related Cancer Risks: Practical Advice for BRCA Risk Management From Male Stakeholders.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31270479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.