Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270457›Full record

ArticleNature2019

Isomerization of BRCA1-BARD1 promotes replication fork protection.

Manuel Daza-Martin, Katarzyna Starowicz, Mohammed Jamshad, Stephanie Tye, George E Ronson, Hannah L MacKay, Anoop Singh Chauhan, Alexandra K Walker, Helen R Stone, James F J Beesley and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms and disease relevance of DNA break repair pathway choice.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CHAMP1 complex promotes heterochromatin assembly and reduces replication stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. ISGylation: is our genome yearning for such a modification?Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Repetitive Sequence Stability in Embryonic Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel Daza-MartinBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Katarzyna StarowiczBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mohammed JamshadBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Stephanie TyeSection of Structural Biology, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
George E RonsonBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Hannah L MacKayBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anoop Singh ChauhanBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Alexandra K WalkerBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Helen R StoneBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James F J BeesleyBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jennifer L ColesBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Alexander J GarvinBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Grant S StewartBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Thomas J McCorvieSection of Structural Biology, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Xiaodong ZhangSection of Structural Biology, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ruth M DenshamBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. r.m.densham@bham.ac.uk.
Joanna R MorrisBirmingham Centre for Genome Biology and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. j.morris.3@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19062Medical Research Council MR/J001201/1Medical Research Council MR/N000188/1Wellcome Trust 210658/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrity of genomes is constantly threatened by problems encountered by the replication fork. BRCA1, BRCA2 and a subset of Fanconi anaemia proteins protect stalled replication forks from degradation by nucleases, through pathways that involve RAD51. The contribution and regulation of BRCA1 in replication fork protection, and how this role relates to its role in homologous recombination, is unclear. Here we show that BRCA1 in complex with BARD1, and not the canonical BRCA1-PALB2 interaction, is required for fork protection. BRCA1-BARD1 is regulated by a conformational change mediated by the phosphorylation-directed prolyl isomerase PIN1. PIN1 activity enhances BRCA1-BARD1 interaction with RAD51, thereby increasing the presence of RAD51 at stalled replication structures. We identify genetic variants of BRCA1-BARD1 in patients with cancer that exhibit poor protection of nascent strands but retain homologous recombination proficiency, thus defining domains of BRCA1-BARD1 that are required for fork protection and associated with cancer development. Together, these findings reveal a BRCA1-mediated pathway that governs replication fork protection.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationBRCA1 ProteinCell Line, TumorGenomic InstabilityHumansIsomerismMutationNIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl IsomerasePhosphorylationPhosphoserineProtein BindingRad51 RecombinaseTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesBARD1 protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanNIMA-Interacting Peptidylprolyl IsomerasePhosphoserinePIN1 protein, humanRAD51 protein, humanRad51 RecombinaseTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID31270457
OpenAlexW2955142199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.