Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270432›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Neonatal transport in California: findings from a qualitative investigation.

Vishnu Priya Akula, Laura C Hedli, Krisa Van Meurs, Jeffrey B Gould, Kan Peiyi, Henry C Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development of consensus guidelines for classification of emergent neonatal transports using a Delphi process.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neonatal Transport Ventilation: Simulation to Improve Knowledge and Skills.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vishnu Priya AkulaDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA. akulavishnupriya@gmail.com.
Laura C HedliDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Krisa Van MeursDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeffrey B GouldDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Kan PeiyiCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Henry C LeeDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8383-1720

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify characteristics of neonatal transport in California and which factors influence team performance. STUDY

designWe led focus group discussions with 19 transport teams operating in California, interviewing 158 neonatal transport team members. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

resultThe composition of transport teams varied widely. There was strong thematic resonance to suggest that the nature of emergent neonatal transports is unpredictable and poses several significant challenges including staffing, ambulance availability, and administrative support. Teams reported dealing with this unpredictability by engaging in teamwork, gathering experience with staff at referral hospitals, planning for a wide variety of circumstances, specialized training, debriefing after events, and implementing quality improvement strategies.

conclusionOur findings suggest potential opportunities for improvement in neonatal transport. Future research can explore the cost and benefits of strategies such as dedicated transport services, transfer centers, and telemedicine.

Indexed as

Infant, NewbornPatient Care TeamCaliforniaFocus GroupsHumansIntensive Care Units, NeonatalInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementTertiary Care CentersTransportation of PatientsWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID31270432
PMCPMC7223647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.