Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270334›Full record

ArticleScientific data2019

A dataset of egg size and shape from more than 6,700 insect species.

Samuel H Church, Seth Donoughe, Bruno A S de Medeiros, Cassandra G Extavour

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coevolution between eggs and sperm of insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pollen wall patterns as a model for biological self-assembly.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. ThePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. There and back again: A sperm's tale.Molecular reproduction and development · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel H ChurchDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States. church@g.harvard.edu.
Seth DonougheDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States.
Bruno A S de MedeirosDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1663-668X
Cassandra G ExtavourDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, United States. extavour@oeb.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2922-5855

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE1745303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Offspring size is a fundamental trait in disparate biological fields of study. This trait can be measured as the size of plant seeds, animal eggs, or live young, and it influences ecological interactions, organism fitness, maternal investment, and embryonic development. Although multiple evolutionary processes have been predicted to drive the evolution of offspring size, the phylogenetic distribution of this trait remains poorly understood, due to the difficulty of reliably collecting and comparing offspring size data from many species. Here we present a dataset of 10,449 morphological descriptions of insect eggs, with records for 6,706 unique insect species and representatives from every extant hexapod order. The dataset includes eggs whose volumes span more than eight orders of magnitude. We created this dataset by partially automating the extraction of egg traits from the primary literature. In the process, we overcame challenges associated with large-scale phenotyping by designing and employing custom bioinformatic solutions to common problems. We matched the taxa in this dataset to the currently accepted scientific names in taxonomic and genetic databases, which will facilitate the use of these data for testing pressing evolutionary hypotheses in offspring size evolution.

Indexed as

InsectaAnimalsOvumSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31270334
PMCPMC6610123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.