Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31270179›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Multicenter Clinical Validation of the Molecular BD Max Enteric Viral Panel for Detection of Enteric Pathogens.

William Stokes, Patricia J Simner, Joel Mortensen, Margret Oethinger, Kathleen Stellrecht, Elizabeth Lockamy, Tricia Lay, Peggy Bouchy, Dylan R Pillai

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

William StokesDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Patricia J SimnerDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joel MortensenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Margret OethingerProvidence Regional Laboratory, Oregon Region, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kathleen StellrechtDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Elizabeth LockamyBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences, Sparks, Maryland, USA.
Tricia LayBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences, Sparks, Maryland, USA.
Peggy BouchyBecton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Dylan R PillaiDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada drpillai@ucalgary.ca.
Becton Dickinson (United States) · USUniversity of Calgary · CAAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USBecton Dickinson (Canada) · CACincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USProvidence College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional methodology for gastrointestinal pathogen detection remains time-consuming, expensive, and of limited sensitivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the BD Max enteric viral panel (Max EVP) assay for identification of viral pathogens in stool specimens from individuals with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis, enteritis, or colitis. Prospective and archival stool specimens from adult and pediatric patients with diarrhea were collected in Cary-Blair medium or unpreserved containers. The results for specimens tested by the Max EVP (on the BD Max platform) were compared to those obtained by the reference method (alternate PCR assays, followed by bidirectional sequencing). Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. A total of 2,239 specimens were collected, with 2,148 being included for analysis. In this population, 39.6% of specimens were from outpatients, 42.1% were from patients <21 years old, and 49.7% were from females. Prevalence rates for prospective specimens were 7.3%, 4.5%, 3.5%, 2.4%, and 1.2% for norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus, respectively. PPA was 92.8%, 84.9%, 93.0%, 100%, and 95.6%, for norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus, respectively. NPA was ≥99.4% for all targets. In conjunction with the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and epidemiological information, the Max EVP assay is effective for the differential diagnosis of enteric disease caused by norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus. This assay can be used individually for patients at high risk for a viral enteropathogen (e.g., in outbreak settings) or as an adjunct to other enteric bacterial panels.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDiarrheaFecesFemaleGastroenteritisHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedadenovirusastrovirusBD Maxenteric pathogensenteric viral panelgastrointestinal panelnorovirusrotavirussapovirus

Identifiers

PMID31270179
PMCPMC6711915
OpenAlexW2956144136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.