[Long-pulsed 1064 nm Nd: YAG laser combined with terbinafine against chromoblastomycosis caused by

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. New methylene blue-mediated photodynamic inactivation of multidrug-resistant Fonsecaea nubica infected chromoblastomycosis in vitro.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
   Article
2. Antifungal Activity of a Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet 1,064-Nanometer Laser against Sporothrix globosa by Inducing Apoptosis and Pyroptosis via the NLRP3/Caspase-1 Signaling Pathway:Microbiology spectrum · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as