Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269991›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Self-efficacy and self-management strategies in acute intermittent porphyria.

Marte H Hammersland, Aasne K Aarsand, Sverre Sandberg, Janice Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Marte H HammerslandNorwegian Porphyria Centre (NAPOS), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Post Office Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway. marte.hovik.hammersland@helse-bergen.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-969X
Aasne K AarsandNorwegian Porphyria Centre (NAPOS), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Post Office Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Sverre SandbergNorwegian Porphyria Centre (NAPOS), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Post Office Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Janice AndersenNorwegian Porphyria Centre (NAPOS), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Post Office Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is an inherited metabolic disease with low clinical penetrance caused by mutations in the hydroxymethylbilane (HMBS) gene. Although most patients experience little or no symptoms, serious attacks may include excruciating pain, severe electrolyte disturbances, paresis, and respiratory failure. Several drugs and lifestyle factors are potential attack inducers and avoiding known triggers is important to avoid symptomatic disease in both patients and genetically predisposed carriers. Our aim in this study was to describe self-efficacy and self-management strategies in self-reported symptomatic and asymptomatic HMBS mutation carriers, and to elucidate motives for predictive genetic testing.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional retrospective survey with postal questionnaires. We received responses from 140 HMBS carriers for the general self-efficacy scale (GSES), study-specific questions about symptoms, self-management strategies and motives for genetic testing and satisfaction with the genetic counseling scale (SCS).

resultsThe results indicated high levels of self-efficacy in these Norwegian HMBS mutation carriers. Both self-reported symptomatic and asymptomatic cases recorded changes in behavior after diagnosis, such as avoiding possible triggering drugs and aspiring recommended eating habits. They were in general satisfied with the genetic counseling they had received. The possibility to prevent disease and learn about the risk of their children was their most important motives to undergo genetic testing.

conclusionsThis study indicates that continuing to provide information, counseling and education is beneficial in AIP, and that HMBS mutation carriers, both those self-assessed as asymptomatic and as symptomatic, are using their knowledge to avoid triggering factors.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedPorphyria, Acute IntermittentPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesAcute intermittent porphyriaGeneral self-efficacy scaleGenetic counselingPredictive genetic testingSatisfaction with genetic counseling scaleSelf-efficacySelf-management strategies

Identifiers

PMID31269991
PMCPMC6607542
OpenAlexW2954865427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.